Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Bailing for greener pastures? >

Bailing for greener pastures?

Search

Notices

Bailing for greener pastures?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016, 08:40 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
Why the hell would anyone 35yo or younger stay at Alaska Airlines? Delta pays MILLIONS more over a career.
Getting a call at Delta isn't easy.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 09:30 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 737 tiller master
Posts: 288
Default

Originally Posted by EskimoJoe
Why the hell would anyone 35yo or younger stay at Alaska Airlines? Delta pays MILLIONS more over a career.
I'm not the one to tell the new guys to leave for greener pastures. I don't give out career advice unless I'm asked. I can think four types of folks who'll stay: 4th stripers, the older folks, the die hards, and the rejects.
For anyone under 40, you are leaving a lot of money and time on the table by staying if you can get on with DAL, UAL, FedEx, and even SWA. Do a simple spread sheet. If history is an indicator, this management will drag this out as long as they can and the union will buckle under pressure. I hope that I'm completely off.
Arctichicken is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 06:39 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by plt32173
The current TPA negotiations is the nasty play I believe he speaks of. Management came back to the table with a worse offer and wants us to take concessions.....
A replay of 1987 when they bought Jet America. They told the pilots if they didn't give concessions, they'd shrink AS and grow JA.

Guess what happened next.

Lokks like a replay only with VX as the whipsaw.
Packrat is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 07:31 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CassinAK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Captain
Posts: 327
Default Bailing for greener pastures?

People keep talking about the company wanting concessions. Right now they are only stuck on section 2 of the TPA which governs how long we have to negotiate a JCBA. It has nothing to do with what's in the JCBA. I'm not saying that AAG wouldn't want concessions but from talking to our MEC and LEC the issue is the speed at which we are required to negotiate the JCBA. We haven't even started negotiating the actual contract.
CassinAK is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 08:53 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by CassinAK
People keep talking about the company wanting concessions. Right now they are only stuck on section 2 of the TPA which governs how long we have to negotiate a JCBA. It has nothing to do with what's in the JCBA. I'm not saying that AAG wouldn't want concessions but from talking to our MEC and LEC the issue is the speed at which we are required to negotiate the JCBA. We haven't even started negotiating the actual contract.
The word concessions came from the email the MEC sent out. The last sentence.
Section 2 doesn't just spell out the length of time for JCBA but what sections are opened up. What I'm hearing is that management did NOT want to visit the section with scope. And when both Parties said no way management came back and said if we open up scope we open up every section for a give and take. Just what I'm hearing.
plt32173 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 09:25 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 784
Default

Alaska management must be about 10 years behind the game with scope and the mentality towards it. The real legacies are shrinking rj flying but Alaska still thinks rj's are the best thing since sliced bread.
OCCP is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 09:30 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by OCCP
Alaska management must be about 10 years behind the game with scope and the mentality towards it. The real legacies are shrinking rj flying but Alaska still thinks rj's are the best thing since sliced bread.
They are when Horizon gets brand new E175s that have the ability to fly the current routes of Virgin 319s, the leases of which are due up in the not too distant future. When Horizon lost the CR7s and had just Q400s, maybe scope wasn't as big a deal. But now with Horizon's largest aircraft order in history to get E175s, scope is (and/or should be) one of top issues.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-05-2016, 10:15 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Position: 737 tiller master
Posts: 288
Default

Originally Posted by plt32173
The word concessions came from the email the MEC sent out. The last sentence.
Section 2 doesn't just spell out the length of time for JCBA but what sections are opened up. What I'm hearing is that management did NOT want to visit the section with scope. And when both Parties said no way management came back and said if we open up scope we open up every section for a give and take. Just what I'm hearing.
Okay then, let's open up every section, I say. There will be no give and take, only take. This management group has taken just about everything from us. I hope this pilot group grows some balls and lose the old mindset of give & take. Nah uh...not this time around! We hold the wrecking ball on this go.
Arctichicken is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 08:09 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CassinAK's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: Captain
Posts: 327
Default

Originally Posted by plt32173
The word concessions came from the email the MEC sent out. The last sentence.

Section 2 doesn't just spell out the length of time for JCBA but what sections are opened up. What I'm hearing is that management did NOT want to visit the section with scope. And when both Parties said no way management came back and said if we open up scope we open up every section for a give and take. Just what I'm hearing.


I didn't realize that section 2 listed what sections are going to be discussed. It all makes more sense now.
CassinAK is offline  
Old 10-06-2016, 08:21 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 160
Default

This scope thing, trying to wrap my head around it (as an outsider). Scope would prevent AAG from flying RJs on traditionally Alaska Airlines routes? Basically preventing a creep of services to low cost carriers under the same colors as Alaska Airlines? What other sorts of things would having a scope clause protect against?
OrionDriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SkyPig09
Military
57
10-20-2012 06:30 AM
Check Essential
American
45
10-07-2012 10:18 AM
renman95
Cargo
22
08-15-2012 02:38 PM
Seeburg220
Hangar Talk
1
07-23-2007 10:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices