Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America >

Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America

Search

Notices

Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2016, 01:00 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,821
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
I have friends at SWA who told me they will have to be there 15 years now to make Captain. The merger added 5 years to their career progression.
Bu!!$hit. As opposed to what? The zero growth they were experiencing when they bought us? How long was their upgrade supposed to take then?

Try not to believe everything you hear from a group that got all of the captain seats and gained an average of 8% in relative seniority while we took an average 22% hit. Unless your friends are those that got hired after the Date of Merger announcement and think they should have been put ahead of anyone that was already on property
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 03:20 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: C47 PIC/747-400 SIC
Posts: 2,100
Default

Sorry Whacky old chum ,my wife would have made captain this year,she is looking at 5 more years in an albeit lucrative right seat, thanks to the merger, she and I aren't bitter, this biz is what it is, but facts is facts, even if they don't fit your agenda, and by the way we aren't tranny haters, 2 very good friends came along with the merger, one is "meh" about it,the other is very glad to be part of SWA, life goes on. Cheers out.
727C47 is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 04:53 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 184
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER

Try not to believe everything you hear from a group that got all of the captain seats....
So, not 1 AT pilot transitioned to SWA as a Captain? Might want to verify that.

I don't know if my upgrade will be pushed back 5 years, but I do know that 750 former AT pilots have dibs on it before I do.
PropPiedmont is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 04:58 AM
  #44  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
Only a guess, but as AS returns the jets, the pilots will be furloughed.
The upside to that is if they are furloughed, technically they'd have recall rights to AS as the company adds the Boeings they have on order.

That would be really bad news for the poolies.

If there is any if the SLI is relative at all it could be AS pilots furloughed.
PasserOGas is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 05:36 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

I'm still trying to figure out why AK would want this? For a few slots/gates? Just doesn't seem to be much in it for them. Or am I missing something?
WARich is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 05:43 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MSP7ERB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 167
Default

Originally Posted by WARich
I'm still trying to figure out why AK would want this? For a few slots/gates? Just doesn't seem to be much in it for them. Or am I missing something?
It's not so much that Alaska wants it. They would do it to block JetBlue from being the buyer of Virgin. A JB/VA deal would be a big threat to Alaska.
MSP7ERB is online now  
Old 04-03-2016, 05:46 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by MSP7ERB
It's not so much that Alaska wants it. They would do it to block JetBlue from being the buyer of Virgin. A JB/VA deal would be a big threat to Alaska.
Maybe I'm also missing something else, but I don't see a JB/VA being a big threat to Alaska. JB/VA pretty much overlap on all the routes, sure some additional slots/gates, but a big threat to Alaska, I don't buy it. I guess it would get JB into Hawaii, but JB has the HA codeshares and Hawaii is pretty saturated it seems.
WARich is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 06:00 AM
  #48  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas
If there is any if the SLI is relative at all it could be AS pilots furloughed.
Not if AS draws down VX while operating it as a separate entity. Remember Comair?
Packrat is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 06:14 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

There are a lot of subjects that have to discussed here. One of which is there can be no staple. Second, the language in AS's CBA about M&A. Does it state the Company being AS or AAG? The reason I mention this is, as a former QXer, we were burned by the same such language. If it's with Alaska Airlines, then I believe it's going to tough because VX would be part of AAG. Not part of Alaska Airlines. Another thing is the eventual integration. You can't do relative seniority because there is no way that a 9 year Captain at VX should placed ahead of a 25 year Captain at AS. Date of hire is not really fair either because almost every Captain at VX would be knocked out of there seat. I believe upgrade at AS is around 9 years???
DashTrash is offline  
Old 04-03-2016, 06:15 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 33
Default

General question, does a merger or acquisition date ,with regards to contracts and/or ALPA, become effective when a company makes an announcement or after regulatory approval(various govt agencies depending on domestic, international etc) ?
ORMtflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Flyin1500
Major
11
12-08-2008 06:07 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
A320fumes
Major
3
03-21-2007 07:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices