Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America >

Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America

Search

Notices

Alaska nearing deal to acquire Virgin America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2016, 08:33 AM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
So pointing out that Northwest and Continental were purchased for far less than Virgin America, a LCC, is me trying to be a "CEO"? I think its a fairly basic financial comparison. Why wait until now? Only because JB wanted to buy them? Why not buy them last year, or 3 years ago when they would have been cheaper. The upside reasons (growth in west coast) would have still existed, plus VA would have had far less debt back then.

Alaska's market value is $9.9B. That includes Horizon. So they basically are paying over 40% of their existing value to acquire VA? I don't think SFO and LAX "gate space" is worth $4B. Especially when you have to consider that you've just added a different fleet type to your airline. Plus if they decide to scrap the Airbus and buy new Boeing's they have to pay for those as well.

I've always admired Alaska's conservative pro-airline management. My faith in them is starting to crack.
Until the last couple of years, I think that ALK's management was willing to wait until VX died, ala IndependenceAir and Skybus.

There were a couple of original investors that finally walked away from VX while Branson and Cyrus kept throwing money into a black hole known as VX. I'd have to go over all of the money Cyrus and Branson poured into VX with the multiple restructurings, but I suspect that they didn't do much better than break even on ALK's buyout.

With fuel prices being where they're at and VX taking more aircraft this last year, VX's business model was reaching critical mass where they could survive without any additional capital. ALK management made a pragmatic decision to kill competition.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 08:34 AM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 993
Default

So what happens to the strategy of keeping JB out of the west coast if/when they buy HA and do exactly that.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 08:38 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
So what happens to the strategy of keeping JB out of the west coast if/when they buy HA and do exactly that.
What's HA's west coast presence? Gates and daily flights? How does that overlay with JBLU? Is it possible to expand operations at any overlapping airports?

How many east coast JBLU customers want to fly to HA and the Pacific? Wouldn't this cannibalize JBLU's Caribbean service?

I don't think that they'll fit together very well.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:06 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 993
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
What's HA's west coast presence? Gates and daily flights? How does that overlay with JBLU? Is it possible to expand operations at any overlapping airports?

How many east coast JBLU customers want to fly to HA and the Pacific? Wouldn't this cannibalize JBLU's Caribbean service?

I don't think that they'll fit together very well.
JB could get instant access to WBs and future orders and redistribute them to areas they currently or hope to expand to soon.....Caribbean, Central/South America, Western Europe, etc.....

HA has gates in areas VX had (SFO, LAX) as well as many others on the west coast.......

Don't know what the cost would be, but I can see this as a very viable alternative for JB to significantly increase their west coast presence....

Last edited by BunkerF16; 04-06-2016 at 09:26 AM.
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:18 AM
  #115  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 787
Posts: 776
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
You're missing consolidation. Which means less competition. Which means more pricing power. Which means higher ticket prices for all remaining airlines. Which means higher profitability for all remaining airlines.

I'm expecting a few more mergers in the airline industry over the next few years.

As an airline employee, I applaud industry consolidation because higher airline ticket prices means higher pay for those of us who work in the industry. Just like our post-911 pay cuts translated into lower ticket prices for the public. I want to get some of that money back from the public.
I agree with this completely. The other airlines benefit from the consolidation without having to foot the bill.
svergin is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:20 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
JB could get instant access to WBs and future orders and redistribute them to areas they currently or hope to expand to soon.....Caribbean, Central/South America, Western Europe, etc.....

HA has gates in areas VX had (SFO, LAX) as well as many others on the west coast.......

Don't know what the cost would be, but I can see this as a very viable alternative for JB to get significantly increase their west coast presence....
HA's widebody deployment is likely more profitable than the routes you're suggesting.

HA doesn't have significant west coast presence...
Andy is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:21 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,171
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
I agree with this completely. The other airlines benefit from the consolidation without having to foot the bill.
Every surviving airline's expected to 'take one for the team...'. It's eat or be eaten.
Andy is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:27 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gooddeal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Wicked Artsy, Moderately Fartsy
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
So pointing out that Northwest and Continental were purchased for far less than Virgin America, a LCC, is me trying to be a "CEO"? I think its a fairly basic financial comparison. Why wait until now? Only because JB wanted to buy them? Why not buy them last year, or 3 years ago when they would have been cheaper. The upside reasons (growth in west coast) would have still existed, plus VA would have had far less debt back then.

Alaska's market value is $9.9B. That includes Horizon. So they basically are paying over 40% of their existing value to acquire VA? I don't think SFO and LAX "gate space" is worth $4B. Especially when you have to consider that you've just added a different fleet type to your airline. Plus if they decide to scrap the Airbus and buy new Boeing's they have to pay for those as well.

I've always admired Alaska's conservative pro-airline management. My faith in them is starting to crack.
Here are your basic financials in the transaction

Alaska pays 13x of VA net worth to:

- eliminate a carrier whose pricing in common AS markets hurts their ability to fare war against DL/AA/UA.

- purchase slot controlled gate spaces at airports which would significantly delay the opportunity to gain gates organically

- transfer DC/NY/California customers who fly between markets not currently served by AS into near-term AS earnings

- prevent the merger of VA + B6 (or virtually anyone else) whose pricing could further bleed out AS earnings or be cost-prohibitive to organically creating new AS markets

- leverage the discounted cost of the new ground services operation AS announced plus the introduction of QX E-175s across a larger network in competitive markets

The fact that there is a dissimilar fleet, leased equipment, VA historical earnings, value of VA, cost comparison of any other airline transaction or any other reason you can point out is actually irrelevant. The 2016 market rate to buy out the officers and investors of an airline who could continue to undermine AS ability to compete independently was 13x VA value...which at $2.6B cash is a steal considering waiting until a larger legacy to enter a bidding war could've driven the acquisition cost to high for AS to win.
gooddeal is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:34 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Posts: 993
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
HA's widebody deployment is likely more profitable than the routes you're suggesting.

HA doesn't have significant west coast presence...
Routes currently more profitable? Probably. I'm just a dumb pilot, not a route designer/analyzer. But the future WBs could be distributed elsewhere.

As far as HA and their west coast presence, is it really that much less than VX's?
BunkerF16 is offline  
Old 04-06-2016, 09:40 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 667
Default

Haven't kept up on the news reports about this, but I have to assume its more for defensive reasons with JB than to truly capitalize on M&A synergies. Last thing AK needs is for another large airline with ample connections to the east coast to have west coast presence. Imo, JB doesn't lose anything, Delta is going to have a slightly larger challenge making money in the northwest now, United impact remains to be seen because I don't think AK wants all the VX airplanes anyway, and AA with no dog in the fight wins. Big loser is AK for overpaying, but they kind of had to avoid JB taking it. AK was kind of doomed after the legacy mergers. They just don't have the route network to stay relevant with Delta making the SEA push and everyone else expanding due to favorable market conditions. Buying VX isn't going to solve any problems. JB buy AK 10 years from now. Heard it here first.
webecheck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Flyin1500
Major
11
12-08-2008 06:07 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
A320fumes
Major
3
03-21-2007 07:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices