Alaska Air Hiring
#6461
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,827
I’m at QX and curious what to expect of air group. They said today they need just 60% or so of the pilots we have no by years end to staff the 33 E175s. Makes me nervous about coming to Alaska via pathways. (Still a year or so from that). Is Alaska gonna stop hiring/downsize soon too?
#6462
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,288
#6464
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: B737, CA
Posts: 177
I’m at QX and curious what to expect of air group. They said today they need just 60% or so of the pilots we have no by years end to staff the 33 E175s. Makes me nervous about coming to Alaska via pathways. (Still a year or so from that). Is Alaska gonna stop hiring/downsize soon too?
I doubt they could staff any more than that a year from now.
#6465
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
So I guess all the leaked pay rates before were BS. What a surprise (not really) in the era of misinformation and fake news.
Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.
What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”
But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.
What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”
But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
#6466
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
So I guess all the leaked pay rates before were BS. What a surprise (not really) in the era of misinformation and fake news.
Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.
What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”
But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.
What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”
But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
#6467
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”
Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
#6468
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: GearBbychoice
Posts: 159
Nah. Just wondering if you will temper down just a wee bit now that the REAL United deal has been released, instead of the fake news before. I’ve met guys who are saying a NO based on DOS of 320/hr. Not DOS+3 at 320, a no to DOS at 320. Others who are a no vote based on reserve rules.
Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”
Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”
Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
#6470
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 747
Nah. Just wondering if you will temper down just a wee bit now that the REAL United deal has been released, instead of the fake news before. I’ve met guys who are saying a NO based on DOS of 320/hr. Not DOS+3 at 320, a no to DOS at 320. Others who are a no vote based on reserve rules.
Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”
Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”
Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
When a pilot says "my MEC speaks for me" they mean they have taken their concerns to the MEC and that if the company wants to find out what they will find acceptable for a new contract the company they can engage in a meaningful negotiation with our Union leadership. The saying is effectively letting management know that they should put forward a sincere effort to negotiate with our Union. Not whatever it is you are getting at.
Back on topic: prospective new hires should be aware that 25 captains have been displaced to FO by a rather disorganized and not very thoughtful Airbus base closure. In addition more captains who have recently been awarded captain have been bumped back to FO. Many have not even had the opportunity to go through Captain training.
There have been a lot of FO vacancies created by the latest bid. This isn't meaningful growth it's mostly to replace junior pilots who have left for greener pastures. Prospective new hires should give a lot of thought to the seniority issues at potential employers. With so many choices available it is important to move up the list quickly. Both for career progression and protection from furlough during increasingly uncertain economic times.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post