Search

Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2022, 09:51 PM
  #6461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 1,827
Default

Originally Posted by Tireteapot
I’m at QX and curious what to expect of air group. They said today they need just 60% or so of the pilots we have no by years end to staff the 33 E175s. Makes me nervous about coming to Alaska via pathways. (Still a year or so from that). Is Alaska gonna stop hiring/downsize soon too?
Unlikely. We are understaffed. Horizon will be too. Don’t wait for pathways. Put apps in anywhere you might like to work.
AtlCSIP is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 08:30 AM
  #6462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,288
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Unlikely. We are understaffed. Horizon will be too. Don’t wait for pathways. Put apps in anywhere you might like to work.
I don’t have the most recent Alaska bid handy but wasn’t the overall pilot count going down by about 200 between now and November?
ImperialxRat is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 09:57 AM
  #6463  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 60
Default

No… that’s just the comparison between the total pilots on the seniority list today vs how many will be on the base position lists for bidding purposes.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
fucius is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 11:10 AM
  #6464  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Position: B737, CA
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by Tireteapot
I’m at QX and curious what to expect of air group. They said today they need just 60% or so of the pilots we have no by years end to staff the 33 E175s. Makes me nervous about coming to Alaska via pathways. (Still a year or so from that). Is Alaska gonna stop hiring/downsize soon too?
My gut tells me that QX will be 50% smaller than it is today one year from now. I think the Q400 will indeed go away by years end and the company will shrink to just 33 small jets.
I doubt they could staff any more than that a year from now.
Mudhen200 is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 11:36 AM
  #6465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

So I guess all the leaked pay rates before were BS. What a surprise (not really) in the era of misinformation and fake news.



Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.


What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”

But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 01:00 PM
  #6466  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
So I guess all the leaked pay rates before were BS. What a surprise (not really) in the era of misinformation and fake news.



Anyway, just from reading these forums it seems plenty of people (UA and at AS) are talking about being a no vote. Not impressed with pay rates and work rules (especially reserve rules). In AS case, the proposed rules.


What happened to our standard issue line of “my MEC speaks for me!”

But once the MEC speaks for me, passes the TA. Say now you vote NO. Isn’t that a direct slap in the face to the long standing line of “my MEC speaks for me.” Clearly, they didn’t if you vote no.
We know you're desperate for any new deal. You just don't have to be so transparent about it.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 01:06 PM
  #6467  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,939
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
We know you're desperate for any new deal. You just don't have to be so transparent about it.
Nah. Just wondering if you will temper down just a wee bit now that the REAL United deal has been released, instead of the fake news before. I’ve met guys who are saying a NO based on DOS of 320/hr. Not DOS+3 at 320, a no to DOS at 320. Others who are a no vote based on reserve rules.



Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”

Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 01:36 PM
  #6468  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: GearBbychoice
Posts: 159
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Nah. Just wondering if you will temper down just a wee bit now that the REAL United deal has been released, instead of the fake news before. I’ve met guys who are saying a NO based on DOS of 320/hr. Not DOS+3 at 320, a no to DOS at 320. Others who are a no vote based on reserve rules.



Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”

Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
I know your being sarcastic but just I case you aren’t. My MEC speaks for me in all dealings with the company. When it comes to any vote I speak for myself.
Flaps1check is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 01:37 PM
  #6469  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 46
Default

And here I thought I still get to vote after allowing my mec to negotiate for me/speak for me.
noodle is offline  
Old 06-24-2022, 01:44 PM
  #6470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 747
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Nah. Just wondering if you will temper down just a wee bit now that the REAL United deal has been released, instead of the fake news before. I’ve met guys who are saying a NO based on DOS of 320/hr. Not DOS+3 at 320, a no to DOS at 320. Others who are a no vote based on reserve rules.



Why you hating on me when I believe “my MEC speaks for me.”

Which means, if my MEC votes yes on a TA and then passes it to me for a vote, I’ll vote yes too. Because my MEC speaks for me. Why, do they not speak for you?
You're simply making up a new meaning for "my MEC speaks for me" and then using the incorrect meaning of the saying to prove something. What you're getting at I am not quite sure?

When a pilot says "my MEC speaks for me" they mean they have taken their concerns to the MEC and that if the company wants to find out what they will find acceptable for a new contract the company they can engage in a meaningful negotiation with our Union leadership. The saying is effectively letting management know that they should put forward a sincere effort to negotiate with our Union. Not whatever it is you are getting at.

Back on topic: prospective new hires should be aware that 25 captains have been displaced to FO by a rather disorganized and not very thoughtful Airbus base closure. In addition more captains who have recently been awarded captain have been bumped back to FO. Many have not even had the opportunity to go through Captain training.

There have been a lot of FO vacancies created by the latest bid. This isn't meaningful growth it's mostly to replace junior pilots who have left for greener pastures. Prospective new hires should give a lot of thought to the seniority issues at potential employers. With so many choices available it is important to move up the list quickly. Both for career progression and protection from furlough during increasingly uncertain economic times.
GoodJet is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 06:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 02:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 09:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 01:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 07:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices