Search

Notices

Alaska Air Hiring

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2022, 11:49 AM
  #5681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
Its all a game the companies play. Just like Delta giving the one time flat payment disguised as profit starting to keep the FAs from stepping out of line and unionizing.

We are late in learning to play this game but at least we are fighting now. See you all April 1.
Yup.

This is Delta…


ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 11:57 AM
  #5682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by All Bizniz
I guess when you consistently under pay your pilots, relative to the industry, it gives you a cushion to set aside some of those gains to pay out as profit sharing, even in bad times.
I mean, you do realize, especially last year, they literally changed the formula to ensure a close to 5% payout would happen for 2020 right?

I did the math. Back then it was supposed to be 70% profit, 10% safety, 10% brand, and 10% something else. Putting 0 for profit at 70% weight, the math I got showed about a 1.15% payout for profit share. They did readjust the formula to make it more focus-related and increase the payout 4x as much. We got 4.98% in a year everyone else got $0.00 and a year we lost $1 billion+ (and billions of losses at other airlines).

Now 2021 was a full annual loss overall and you’re getting 6.225% payout. For me, using the calculator that looks like one month of pay (at 75 hr guarantee). Obviously PBP is contractual, but the terms inside of it can be changed at their whim and to be fair, at least they changed metrics around to make sure there was at least close to a 5% payout.

Yes, the contract negotiations are stalled, feet dragging, etc. But if you are honest, they at least did the PBP numbers in the employee’s favor. Especially for 2020 and for 2021 as well.


The strike fund suggestion seems premature, and I’m surprised a local LEC would make that suggestion when the AS MEC has not said so.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 11:59 AM
  #5683  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,205
Default

Originally Posted by PNWFlyer
Mary wasn’t you best subject is school was it?
I was just fine with Mary. I was much better with Wendy though.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 12:02 PM
  #5684  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by conquestdz
6.2% of 30% less pay for 30% more work.
A business operator's dream scenario.
All Bizniz is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 12:17 PM
  #5685  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I mean, you do realize, especially last year, they literally changed the formula to ensure a close to 5% payout would happen for 2020 right?

I did the math. Back then it was supposed to be 70% profit, 10% safety, 10% brand, and 10% something else. Putting 0 for profit at 70% weight, the math I got showed about a 1.15% payout for profit share. They did readjust the formula to make it more focus-related and increase the payout 4x as much. We got 4.98% in a year everyone else got $0.00 and a year we lost $1 billion+ (and billions of losses at other airlines).

Now 2021 was a full annual loss overall and you’re getting 6.225% payout. For me, using the calculator that looks like one month of pay (at 75 hr guarantee). Obviously PBP is contractual, but the terms inside of it can be changed at their whim and to be fair, at least they changed metrics around to make sure there was at least close to a 5% payout.

Yes, the contract negotiations are stalled, feet dragging, etc. But if you are honest, they at least did the PBP numbers in the employee’s favor. Especially for 2020 and for 2021 as well.


The strike fund suggestion seems premature, and I’m surprised a local LEC would make that suggestion when the AS MEC has not said so.
Doesn't matter the financial gymnastics they used to come up with the bonus payment.

I'm just saying that the cushion gets built up over decades because of having salary expenses that are below industry averages. They therefore come out smelling like a rose by looking like the benevolent employer that still gave us PS, even during years when losses were made.

It's contractual, but being shrewd business men, they got us to sign off on them paying us every year end with our own money, and they hope that the blind gratitude of some of us, might allow them to once again get away with a "business as usual" contract when the time comes around.
All Bizniz is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 12:53 PM
  #5686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by All Bizniz
I guess when you consistently under pay your pilots, relative to the industry, it gives you a cushion to set aside some of those gains to pay out as profit sharing, even in bad times.
The bold part won’t happen. The MEC knows what we want. They won’t present us a TA if they know it won’t pass by the majority of the pilot group. I have faith in our MEC.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 02:49 PM
  #5687  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I’m surprised a local LEC would make that suggestion when the AS MEC has not said so.
You do know the MEC takes its orders from the LEC’s right? And the LEC takes direction from its members? Sounds like the pilots of that council are drawing their lines in the sand.
Speed Pilot is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 02:53 PM
  #5688  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
The bold part won’t happen. The MEC knows what we want. They won’t present us a TA if they know it won’t pass by the majority of the pilot group. I have faith in our MEC.
We're certainly on the same page about our confidence in our MEC.
All Bizniz is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 03:13 PM
  #5689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 682
Default

Originally Posted by Speed Pilot
You do know the MEC takes its orders from the LEC’s right? And the LEC takes direction from its members? Sounds like the pilots of that council are drawing their lines in the sand.
Speed Pilot, thanks for that very good explanation on that aspect of how our unions work. I'm sure not all of us really realized how influential we can be in the process.

Curious question...

Over the years, we've heard many stories of MECs, industry wide, seemingly going against the wishes of their pilots, making deals, and presenting TAs or doing side deals that were unpopular, or ultimately had a negative effect. It's the reason why some pilots hate ALPA.

What motivates MECs to sometimes go rogue, if we can call it that?
​​​​​​
​​​​​
All Bizniz is offline  
Old 01-27-2022, 03:22 PM
  #5690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,162
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Yup.

This is Delta…


exactly! And this (6.2% PBP) is Alaska being just as disingenuous.

I read the letters from Management sent to us today. “See, we lost money, but we are still paying you!”

Well, that’s because we have a contract that says you have to, even if we didn’t, management never does anything out of the kindness of their heart. It is always a business decision.

They are most likely hoping the word of this “bonus” gets out and a few starry-eyed NewGuys and HotDogs will sign up to fly with us. Or they really do like us that much???
PNWFlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
joel payne
Foreign
4
04-23-2009 01:38 PM
vagabond
Major
31
04-15-2009 08:51 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
vagabond
Major
19
06-15-2007 06:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices