Alaska Air Hiring
#181
I was told that your company has plans for him and that he's getting one on the side. If he's lucky, they're paying for it. I also heard that SD would have had JH's job if he had only had that sheepskin.
#183
Making friends and impressing people everywhe
#184
That's just it. A few people who you call "disgruntled" are trying to help those same people make an educated decision. That means that they need to get both sides of the equation, the good and the bad at Alaskan Airways. There's your I'm lucky to be anywhere and I'll settle for less side (presumably one of the pansies). Then, there's their it's not all roses sitting next to and throwing gear for a bunch of pansy "I-got-mine-Screw-you-types" looking at a 15-yr upgrade and no quality of life (presumably non-pansy).
Those same disgruntled people have already admitted that if they had to do it all over again in TODAY's hiring environment, Alaska would NOT be their first choice. The people currently interested in Alaska need to know why, unless you're one of those non-pic-turbine-no 4-yr college degree-silver bullet from your daddy-affirmative-action types. In that case, it might be that they're tailor-maid for Alaskan Airways. Now. if they also volunteer in the soup kitchen, they should be golden. Alaskan just might be their cup of tea;
.
ps. what's all this "mud hen" and "arctic eagle" nickname stuff? sounds like a flying club.
.
Those same disgruntled people have already admitted that if they had to do it all over again in TODAY's hiring environment, Alaska would NOT be their first choice. The people currently interested in Alaska need to know why, unless you're one of those non-pic-turbine-no 4-yr college degree-silver bullet from your daddy-affirmative-action types. In that case, it might be that they're tailor-maid for Alaskan Airways. Now. if they also volunteer in the soup kitchen, they should be golden. Alaskan just might be their cup of tea;
.
ps. what's all this "mud hen" and "arctic eagle" nickname stuff? sounds like a flying club.
.
#185
Nice try. The last person I heard say, "I meant to do that." Was my 10 year old.
#186
Now. Now. Don't get your chonies in a bunch.
What's with you Alaska guys? Don't you recognize thinly veiled contempt or troll bait when you see it.
You Alaska pansies just don't wanna have fun.
Last edited by GearBoy; 02-22-2014 at 01:15 PM.
#187
#188
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
The "Mudhen/Arctic Eagle" mentality is a flying club. It originated in the ANC base when the "boys" were flying the 737-200. They all thought they were better pilots than anyone else in the system, especially the Jet America guys.
Unfortunately, that attitude led to them "doing what ever it takes" to get the job done. Why? Because if you wanted to take extra gas due to weather or alternate considerations and left 1000 lbs of dead fish on the ramp, the Ops agent would be on the phone to the ANC CP before you got your wheels in the well. Then you got to "explain" yourself.
I once heard one of the Arctic Eagles berating a Dispatcher for carrying TOO MUCH fuel on a 2500 nm leg from ANC to ORD then DEMAND to talk to the Chief Dispatcher when the guy wouldn't take the fuel off. This on the longest leg in the system, at night, over Canada with limited alternates to the 2nd busiest airport in the U.S. in a 737-700. Why? Because the Arctic Eagles routinely carried minimum fuel. And God help you if you wanted to take on fuel in a remote station like Kotzebue. "We carry gas TO Kotz, we don't take it out of there." Begging the question, "Why then do we TAKE it there if not to use it when needed?"
In Mudhen land, if you couldn't pull the throttles to idle at FL350 and not touch them again until 500 AGL, you weren't up to par. If you had to look at a chart for an FSS frequency anywhere in SE Alaska you weren't good enough. I guess if you spend your whole career flying to 10 or 12 airports you have everything memorized, but the Arctic Eagles demanded that of new hire F/Os and "Outside" new Captains alike. (For those of you non-Alaskans, "Outside" refers to anything outside the borders of the state.)
Yeah, they were quite a bunch. Whenever they got caught doing anything "outside" the regulations their defense was always, "You don't understand how we need to operate." Unfortunately, THEY didn't seem to understand that they still needed to adhere to Part 121 regs even though they were "obviously" superior airmen.
Fortunately, that attitude is mostly gone up there, but pockets still exist. It is very telling that the Chief Mudhen/Arctic Eagle was killed a couple years after he retired scud running...a true Alaska Legend. The saddest thing of all is the "Mudhen" mentality was even embraced by Flight Ops managers even as the scrambled to cover up the errors the mindset produced. Those that they knew about at any rate.
Unfortunately, that attitude led to them "doing what ever it takes" to get the job done. Why? Because if you wanted to take extra gas due to weather or alternate considerations and left 1000 lbs of dead fish on the ramp, the Ops agent would be on the phone to the ANC CP before you got your wheels in the well. Then you got to "explain" yourself.
I once heard one of the Arctic Eagles berating a Dispatcher for carrying TOO MUCH fuel on a 2500 nm leg from ANC to ORD then DEMAND to talk to the Chief Dispatcher when the guy wouldn't take the fuel off. This on the longest leg in the system, at night, over Canada with limited alternates to the 2nd busiest airport in the U.S. in a 737-700. Why? Because the Arctic Eagles routinely carried minimum fuel. And God help you if you wanted to take on fuel in a remote station like Kotzebue. "We carry gas TO Kotz, we don't take it out of there." Begging the question, "Why then do we TAKE it there if not to use it when needed?"
In Mudhen land, if you couldn't pull the throttles to idle at FL350 and not touch them again until 500 AGL, you weren't up to par. If you had to look at a chart for an FSS frequency anywhere in SE Alaska you weren't good enough. I guess if you spend your whole career flying to 10 or 12 airports you have everything memorized, but the Arctic Eagles demanded that of new hire F/Os and "Outside" new Captains alike. (For those of you non-Alaskans, "Outside" refers to anything outside the borders of the state.)
Yeah, they were quite a bunch. Whenever they got caught doing anything "outside" the regulations their defense was always, "You don't understand how we need to operate." Unfortunately, THEY didn't seem to understand that they still needed to adhere to Part 121 regs even though they were "obviously" superior airmen.
Fortunately, that attitude is mostly gone up there, but pockets still exist. It is very telling that the Chief Mudhen/Arctic Eagle was killed a couple years after he retired scud running...a true Alaska Legend. The saddest thing of all is the "Mudhen" mentality was even embraced by Flight Ops managers even as the scrambled to cover up the errors the mindset produced. Those that they knew about at any rate.
Last edited by Packrat; 02-22-2014 at 01:59 PM.
#189
Do you know the projected retirements at AK? Last I heard, it was a 12-15 year Capt. upgrade. Without some sort of major expansion or merger, that's going to be a lot of 737 right seat time compared to opportunities elsewhere.
I think AK is an awesome company with a great culture (for the most part), it's just that everyone is so young that it will present considerable career stagnation for the FNGs.
I think AK is an awesome company with a great culture (for the most part), it's just that everyone is so young that it will present considerable career stagnation for the FNGs.
One would be well-advised to weigh all of the pros and cons of any airline. Far too often we go thru the process with blinders on or we keep asking the same question over and over again until we get the answer we want to hear.
In addition to having many benefits, Alaska also is a small carrier with growth in seat miles only. There appears to be little attrition, now and going forward. There are only about 1400 pilots flying their line in 4 bases. So, no matter how you slice it, there really aren't going to be that many new hires or upgrades going forward any way you slice it. That also means fewer bids and no larger international equipment over which to lateral in the future. No real International flying means lesser non-rev benefits as well and a pocket full of ID-90s for you and your family if you ever get to vacation with them.
So, be prepared to swing gear in the right seat for a very long time. Be prepared for displacements, base changes, force-transfers or worse yet, furlough. Be prepared for a long time on reserve where there's no right or wrong, only contractual and FAR Legal. in addition, expect no eventual perks as a senior FO either. No cushy lines. No vacations in summer. No 777s or 787s and the better pay and schedules that come with them. Plan on years of working weekends, nights and holidays only to eventually ugrade to reserve captain on Reserve in ANC at 12 years or 15 in SEA. But, don't worry. There will be a senior guy standing next to you in OPS on Thanksgiving or Xmas. He'll be the one bragging about getting premium pay or working thru vacation.
Just know what you're getting into. Then maybe you too won't be "disgruntled" in the end. A lot has changed in this industry the last 15 years, especially for those on the lower half of the seniority list.
I can only speak for myself. It didn't go down as I had planned. I don't think that I or any of the other senior FOs in this industry could have predicted or planned on the race to the bottom that the last 15 years has been.
But, the cliché about timing is true. Hopefully the new hires of today will have to wade thru less effluent than we did.
In the end, don't let the job or uniform define who you are. Work to live. Don't live to work.
Last edited by GearBoy; 02-22-2014 at 02:14 PM.
#190
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
There will be a snior guy standing next to you in OPS on Thanksgiving or Xmas. He'll be the one bragging about getting premium pay.
Just know what you're getting into. Then maybe you won't be "disgruntled" in the end. A lot has changed in this industry the last 15 years, especially for those on the lower half of the seniority list.
Just know what you're getting into. Then maybe you won't be "disgruntled" in the end. A lot has changed in this industry the last 15 years, especially for those on the lower half of the seniority list.
It amuses me when telling guys the truth is characterized as "bitter" or "disgruntled." I guess some people can't handle the truth.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post