Search

Notices

AS/HA SLI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2024, 09:59 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,679
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
I think you’d agree that for Alaska to even consider ordering new or buying used 321s would require a seismic shift in philosophy, and the thought of getting more 330s is simply beyond their scope of consideration.
You don’t think buying another carrier with multiple fleets shows a shift in philosophy?
word302 is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 10:00 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
I think you’d agree that for Alaska to even consider ordering new or buying used 321s would require a seismic shift in philosophy, and the thought of getting more 330s is simply beyond their scope of consideration.
So no hope for growth until BA gets it's act together? That's what I am saying. That outlook is not good and I'm planning for stagnation until the SLI is done. Likely more bad news after the SLI.
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 10:12 AM
  #43  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,124
Default

Ugh, do we really need this thread on day 1?
MinRest is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 10:18 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 383
Default

[QUOTE=PineappleXpres;3837837]It’s been stated over and over that it will absolutely go to arbitration because neither MEC wants to be responsible for the results.


Ohhh I'm sorry your MEC said this. I would trust them, just because they go golfing with the CEO doesn't mean anything.

In Unity...
fostro is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 10:49 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Consideration doesn't mean "think about it". The arbitrators have to use it and explain how they intrgrated it into final award. The "big picture" is that an airline that only flies 737s and an airline with 2 different WB types just merged. They may give a lower percentage weighting toward status and category, but its going to be used because its written into the policy. Alaska being a "much larger and secure company" won't likely matter any amount. Merger policy is an ALPA process, and ALPA doesn't care that one company was run by management more efficiently than another one.

"Bump in seniority"? What does that even mean? HA flies WB planes, and AS doesn't. How was AS/VX merged under policy? Did AS get a "bump" for being stronger financially? Where are two pilots that had 8 years longevity at AS and VX on the list? Are they together or did the VX pilot with 8 years longevity get a "bump" because they had a higher status and category?
To answer your question yes. The senior Virgin pilots got hammered on relative seniority. l believe the number 1 Virgin pilot went to 6xx in the SLI. If you don't think the arbitrator isn't going to weigh the fact that Alaska is not the airline being saved then prepare to be disappointed.

​​​Expect about relative seniority and 2 fence for widebodies.
IFlyEm is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:20 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Precarious
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
I think you’d agree that for Alaska to even consider ordering new or buying used 321s would require a seismic shift in philosophy, and the thought of getting more 330s is simply beyond their scope of consideration.
Boeing has cost us a ton of money and brand damage with the multiple max issues, and can't deliver growth airframes that we need. When Boeing was delivering on it's promises for us it was pretty easy to be "Proudly all Boeing". Given the painfully obvious reality that they are no longer that company, it seems pretty hard to justify being blindly loyal to Boeing, especially if it puts us at a competitive disadvantage regarding growth. In other words, if anything will give management a seismic shift in thinking, it would be the reality of what Boeing is today.
conquestdz is online now  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:21 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by fostro
Ohhh I'm sorry your MEC said this. I would trust them, just because they go golfing with the CEO doesn't mean anything.

In Unity...
Dude. Go away.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:50 AM
  #48  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Default

Originally Posted by Yakattack
Apples and oranges, dude. Horizon is a regional airline. Pilots from QX would come to AS with the expectation of going to the bottom of the seniority list. Nobody questions that. When I came to AS from my regional, I didn't expect it to work any other way. Hawaiian and Alaska are two major (legacy, technically) airlines that are integrating.
Not really relevant to this discussion but a regional could not legally be stapled to a major, neither ALPA, A/M, or M/B would allow that. There would be "career expectation" considerations applied to SLI but it would not be a staple. That's why you're very unliekly to ever see a regionalk merged into a major... too much hate and discontent. For the younger folks, DAL was looking at merging COMAIR back in the day, but some CA union folks over-played their hand and insisted on DOH or something similar. Killed the deal, and then soon enough DAL took them out back and put the whole pilot group out of it's misery.

Much as we all "know how it works" when you transition regional => major, that's not actually how the laws work.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:54 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2022
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
Dude. Go away.
Oahu is a very small place. There is definitely a high possibility of outside of work mingling with upper management. Whether it be kids in school, sports functions, church functions or even a round of golf or belonging to the same course. What Fostro says isn't necessarily misinformation.

Again, another case of someone disregarding the message because they don't like the messengers typing..
vaxedtothemax is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:54 AM
  #50  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Default

Originally Posted by Yakattack
DOH is fair. The only other argument that is "fair" for me is that HA takes a hit because their company was doomed. What will likely happen is that HA gets a "bump" because of WBs (as undeserved as it may be), and then takes a hit for their company's financial condition, and we'll arrive at something that resembles DOH anyway. I'm no SLI expert, but that's my gut feeling.
Sounds reasonable to me (fences for WB's is fine too). But that's not how it's likely to work...

WB career expectations are fairly quantifiable... X years at Y payscale, with Z days off.

Future Corporate Financial expectations... not so quantifiable. Might get factored in but not very much I suspect.

Originally Posted by Yakattack
Besides, who really cares about seniority until it's someone in your base, in your seat, on your equipment. If the 737 is as bad as you say, my spot should be pretty safe. You HA dudes think we want your WBs, when it's really we don't want you kicking us out of our bases. 10 year fence and done. lol.
I think I'd be happy with reciprocal fences all around. But that only works until(if) fleet/route consolidation and displacements occurs.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Aviation Technology
0
09-17-2022 10:21 AM
TXMike
Envoy Airlines
94
05-26-2022 02:25 PM
LCAL dude
United
1
11-27-2012 09:08 AM
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices