Search

Notices

AS/HA SLI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2024, 07:01 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by IFlyEm
Factors to be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integratedseniority list, in no particular order and with no particular weight, shall include but not be limited to the following:- Career expectations.- Longevity. - Status and category.

Will status and category be considered? Of course. But you're fooling yourself if you don't think an arbitrator isn't going to consider the big picture. Alaska is a much stronger and secure company. That will carry weight. There really isn't any huge benefit to the Alaska pilot group resulting from this merger. Hawaiian pilots are really the main beneficiaries. I wouldn't hold my breathe for much of a bump in seniority or long lasting fences.
Consideration doesn't mean "think about it". The arbitrators have to use it and explain how they intrgrated it into final award. The "big picture" is that an airline that only flies 737s and an airline with 2 different WB types just merged. They may give a lower percentage weighting toward status and category, but its going to be used because its written into the policy. Alaska being a "much larger and secure company" won't likely matter any amount. Merger policy is an ALPA process, and ALPA doesn't care that one company was run by management more efficiently than another one.

"Bump in seniority"? What does that even mean? HA flies WB planes, and AS doesn't. How was AS/VX merged under policy? Did AS get a "bump" for being stronger financially? Where are two pilots that had 8 years longevity at AS and VX on the list? Are they together or did the VX pilot with 8 years longevity get a "bump" because they had a higher status and category?
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 07:05 AM
  #32  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Exclamation AS/HA SLI Discussion

This thread is for SLI discussion. Some of us are going to disagree about some things, but please keep it ciivil.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 07:05 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
Flex with Boeing and trade 737max slots for 787s since Airbus can take care of immediate narrow body growth.
Good luck getting any 787s that HA doesn't already have on order. United has 150 on order and Boeing is already 14 behind schedule. Ordering a 787 today is going to be a 2032 delivery at the earliest, if that.
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 07:59 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Good luck getting any 787s that HA doesn't already have on order. United has 150 on order and Boeing is already 14 behind schedule. Ordering a 787 today is going to be a 2032 delivery at the earliest, if that.
Here is a helpful spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...CRaT-iqgo/edit

If BA can keep the 787 production at 6 airframes per month, HA will have 10 787s by 2030. The next one should arrive in 2025. The following may arrive in 2026 if there are no delays. It seems any chance for growth lies entirely on the Airbus side. Used 321s or used 330s. Possibly new 330 NEOs?
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 08:28 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Here is a helpful spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...CRaT-iqgo/edit

If BA can keep the 787 production at 6 airframes per month, HA will have 10 787s by 2030. The next one should arrive in 2025. The following may arrive in 2026 if there are no delays. It seems any chance for growth lies entirely on the Airbus side. Used 321s or used 330s. Possibly new 330 NEOs?
Did I read your post correctly, new 330 NEOs think we all know that’s not happening.
flysnoopy76 is online now  
Old 09-18-2024, 08:39 AM
  #36  
Min Credit Line
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Position: FAKES
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Its literally codified into ALPA Merger Policy and used in the last 2 ALPA mergers with widebody planes.

NWA/DAL has 4 "status and categories"...widebody captains, narrow body captains, widebody FOs and narrow body FOs

UAL/CAL had 6 "status and categories". widebody captains, midbody captains (757/767), narrow body captains, widebody FOs, midbody FOs and narrow body FOs (plus both furloughed CAL/UAL pilots)

Both of these are publicly sercheable. Arbitrators are going to give HA pilots a "bump" in seniority because of their widebody planes.

If AS was merging with Horizon, would you just be ok with the 737 being treated the same as a E-175? I'm guessing not.

Neither would an arbitrator.
Apples and oranges, dude. Horizon is a regional airline. Pilots from QX would come to AS with the expectation of going to the bottom of the seniority list. Nobody questions that. When I came to AS from my regional, I didn't expect it to work any other way. Hawaiian and Alaska are two major (legacy, technically) airlines that are integrating. Take United, Delta, American for example. You would not expect a newhire FO in a WB to be granted a higher seniority over a 737 FO hired weeks or months earlier just by virtue of their equipment, would you? Yet that's what you're advocating for, without any strife at all. I'm not a huge fan of that mindset. The ergonomics and lack of cockpit amenities argument is ancillary but serves to further poison the well.

And you must know that there's a much bigger pay disparity between 737 and the E175 then there is between the 737 and your beloved WB's. Do you mean to say that everything that isn't WB is "regional?" Do you mean to be that condescending? SLI will be what it is per precedent and current circumstances, but looking down your nose at your new coworkers won't win you many friends.

DOH is fair. The only other argument that is "fair" for me is that HA takes a hit because their company was doomed. What will likely happen is that HA gets a "bump" because of WBs (as undeserved as it may be), and then takes a hit for their company's financial condition, and we'll arrive at something that resembles DOH anyway. I'm no SLI expert, but that's my gut feeling.

Besides, who really cares about seniority until it's someone in your base, in your seat, on your equipment. If the 737 is as bad as you say, my spot should be pretty safe. You HA dudes think we want your WBs, when it's really we don't want you kicking us out of our bases. 10 year fence and done. lol.
Yakattack is online now  
Old 09-18-2024, 08:46 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jet J's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Here is a helpful spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...CRaT-iqgo/edit

If BA can keep the 787 production at 6 airframes per month, HA will have 10 787s by 2030. The next one should arrive in 2025. The following may arrive in 2026 if there are no delays. It seems any chance for growth lies entirely on the Airbus side. Used 321s or used 330s. Possibly new 330 NEOs?
supposedly we have 10 a320s in the desert still.
Jet J is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 09:36 AM
  #38  
Min Credit Line
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Position: FAKES
Posts: 86
Default

I posted something but the system told me a moderator needed to approve it. Was it too incendiary?
Yakattack is online now  
Old 09-18-2024, 09:37 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by flysnoopy76
Did I read your post correctly, new 330 NEOs think we all know that’s not happening.
In that case our only hope for growth would be 321s or 330s then...
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 09:48 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 489
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
In that case our only hope for growth would be 321s or 330s then...
I think you’d agree that for Alaska to even consider ordering new or buying used 321s would require a seismic shift in philosophy, and the thought of getting more 330s is simply beyond their scope of consideration.
flysnoopy76 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Aviation Technology
0
09-17-2022 10:21 AM
TXMike
Envoy Airlines
94
05-26-2022 02:25 PM
LCAL dude
United
1
11-27-2012 09:08 AM
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices