Search

Notices

AS/HA SLI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2024, 03:36 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Widebody planes require more staffing because you have more pilots in the cockpit depending on the length of the flight. Also HA should have more pilots because it has more fleets, and needs more pilots to cover reserves from multiple pools of reserve pilots instead of just one pool because of a single equipment type being flown.

Currently we have ~22% more FO’s on the 330 to account for augmented flying. There is also a training bubble to staff the additional freighters arriving before year end, and additional 787’s arriving first quarter of next year.
Akamai is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 03:40 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
Currently we have ~22% more FO’s on the 330 to account for augmented flying. There is also a training bubble to staff the additional freighters arriving before year end, and additional 787’s arriving first quarter of next year.
Aren’t we returning two 330p leases end at the end of this year?
Gobows is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 06:19 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by vaxedtothemax
The only staffing scenario you may not be accounting for is the RO postions on long haul flights. That usually produces a heavy list on the FO side. Not sure if it would be enough for 18 pilots per, but it does add I'd say 10% more on the widebodies FO list (ballpark). Also, the Amazon contract has 3 plans that don't appear on our list, but does increase our staffing. I believe that operation is overstaffed due to delays with Amazon receiving a/c.


Like politics today, many don't care that someone is right, only that their fragile feelings were hurt over a keyboard. Cattle is pretty spot on about his thoughts and concerns. We are getting a lifeline because our managements only plan was to sit and wait for Japan to evolve in 2027.

Yeah all the staffing for augmented crew is understandable for 2 of the fleets. Probably not for the 717 or 321. My concern lies with the lack of deliveries. The 787 line is producing 6 aircraft per month. Last year it was 2.5. Assuming this rate remains constant HA/AS will have 10 787s by 2030. The next two scheduled deliveries are in 2025 and 2026. Maybe.

321 Neos have engine issues that I don't know much about. The MAX line is not producing anything at the moment. 330 is the wildcard. I have no idea what the delivery situation looks like for that aircraft.

My concern is: if AS is getting rid of 12, 737-900s and the 717s need to be replaced. What aircraft will replace them? What will happen to two overstaffed pilot groups when furlough protection runs out? I know its 2 years from today for AS at minimum hopefully later whenever the merger is finalized. Once that happens the clock is ticking for airframe replacement. Not even growth.
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 07:01 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by Yakattack
That whole "We fly heavies and therefore deserve a bump in seniority over you lowly 737...
Its literally codified into ALPA Merger Policy and used in the last 2 ALPA mergers with widebody planes.

NWA/DAL has 4 "status and categories"...widebody captains, narrow body captains, widebody FOs and narrow body FOs

UAL/CAL had 6 "status and categories". widebody captains, midbody captains (757/767), narrow body captains, widebody FOs, midbody FOs and narrow body FOs (plus both furloughed CAL/UAL pilots)

Both of these are publicly sercheable. Arbitrators are going to give HA pilots a "bump" in seniority because of their widebody planes.

If AS was merging with Horizon, would you just be ok with the 737 being treated the same as a E-175? I'm guessing not.

Neither would an arbitrator.
FriendlyPilot is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 07:07 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 729
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Its literally codified into ALPA Merger Policy and used in the last 2 ALPA mergers with widebody planes.

NWA/DAL has 4 "status and categories"...widebody captains, narrow body captains, widebody FOs and narrow body FOs

UAL/CAL had 6 "status and categories". widebody captains, midbody captains (757/767), narrow body captains, widebody FOs, midbody FOs and narrow body FOs (plus both furloughed CAL/UAL pilots)

Both of these are publicly sercheable. Arbitrators are going to give HA pilots a "bump" in seniority because of their widebody planes.

If AS was merging with Horizon, would you just be ok with the 737 being treated the same as a E-175? I'm guessing not.

Neither would an arbitrator.
At least we could get more 175s lol
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 07:16 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 130
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
Its literally codified into ALPA Merger Policy and used in the last 2 ALPA mergers with widebody planes.

NWA/DAL has 4 "status and categories"...widebody captains, narrow body captains, widebody FOs and narrow body FOs

UAL/CAL had 6 "status and categories". widebody captains, midbody captains (757/767), narrow body captains, widebody FOs, midbody FOs and narrow body FOs (plus both furloughed CAL/UAL pilots)

Both of these are publicly sercheable. Arbitrators are going to give HA pilots a "bump" in seniority because of their widebody planes.

If AS was merging with Horizon, would you just be ok with the 737 being treated the same as a E-175? I'm guessing not.

Neither would an arbitrator.
Yeah this is 100% going to arbitration and they will have to follow the established ALPA guidelines.

"HA would have been bankrupt if it wasn't for the acquisition!" isn't part of the equation. HA having widebodies, however, is part of the merger language.
PurringRaccoon is online now  
Old 09-17-2024, 08:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2023
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by PurringRaccoon
Yeah this is 100% going to arbitration and they will have to follow the established ALPA guidelines.

"HA would have been bankrupt if it wasn't for the acquisition!" isn't part of the equation. HA having widebodies, however, is part of the merger language.
Fyi.... arbitration is only done for items that are not resolved. I hope you don't have the same "Give it all away MEC".

Good Luck, In Unity...
fostro is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 10:06 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by PurringRaccoon
Yeah this is 100% going to arbitration and they will have to follow the established ALPA guidelines.

"HA would have been bankrupt if it wasn't for the acquisition!" isn't part of the equation. HA having widebodies, however, is part of the merger language.
Factors to be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integratedseniority list, in no particular order and with no particular weight, shall include but not be limited to the following:- Career expectations.- Longevity. - Status and category.

Will status and category be considered? Of course. But you're fooling yourself if you don't think an arbitrator isn't going to consider the big picture. Alaska is a much stronger and secure company. That will carry weight. There really isn't any huge benefit to the Alaska pilot group resulting from this merger. Hawaiian pilots are really the main beneficiaries. I wouldn't hold my breathe for much of a bump in seniority or long lasting fences.
IFlyEm is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 11:08 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by fostro
Fyi.... arbitration is only done for items that are not resolved. I hope you don't have the same "Give it all away MEC".

Good Luck, In Unity...
It’s been stated over and over that it will absolutely go to arbitration because neither MEC wants to be responsible for the results.

Originally Posted by GoodJet
Yeah all the staffing for augmented crew is understandable for 2 of the fleets. Probably not for the 717 or 321. My concern lies with the lack of deliveries. The 787 line is producing 6 aircraft per month. Last year it was 2.5. Assuming this rate remains constant HA/AS will have 10 787s by 2030. The next two scheduled deliveries are in 2025 and 2026. Maybe.

321 Neos have engine issues that I don't know much about. The MAX line is not producing anything at the moment. 330 is the wildcard. I have no idea what the delivery situation looks like for that aircraft.

My concern is: if AS is getting rid of 12, 737-900s and the 717s need to be replaced. What aircraft will replace them? What will happen to two overstaffed pilot groups when furlough protection runs out? I know its 2 years from today for AS at minimum hopefully later whenever the merger is finalized. Once that happens the clock is ticking for airframe replacement. Not even growth.
Jet Blue, Frontier, and Spirit have deferred orders. We’ll take them. We’ll grow while they won’t. Flex with Boeing and trade 737max slots for 787s since Airbus can take care of immediate narrow body growth.

There you go.

Not to mention if they keep the 737MAX-7 for interisland then the timing should work out well for replacing the 717.

So A321 now, 787s faster than Hawaiian has scheduled, and 737MAX-7 in 5 years.

SOC by 2026 anyhow.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 09-17-2024, 11:11 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,211
Default

Originally Posted by IFlyEm
Factors to be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integratedseniority list, in no particular order and with no particular weight, shall include but not be limited to the following:- Career expectations.- Longevity. - Status and category.

Will status and category be considered? Of course. But you're fooling yourself if you don't think an arbitrator isn't going to consider the big picture. Alaska is a much stronger and secure company. That will carry weight. There really isn't any huge benefit to the Alaska pilot group resulting from this merger. Hawaiian pilots are really the main beneficiaries. I wouldn't hold my breathe for much of a bump in seniority or long lasting fences.

This.

However in 10 years, too big to fail/EAS wet dream could come true. HAL would be part of that construct.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Aviation Technology
0
09-17-2022 10:21 AM
TXMike
Envoy Airlines
94
05-26-2022 02:25 PM
LCAL dude
United
1
11-27-2012 09:08 AM
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices