Search

Notices

AS/HA SLI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2024, 09:05 PM
  #151  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by word302
That’s not how this works, that’s not how any of this works. You actually think a 30-year Hawaiian guy should be below a 1-year Alaska guy? I’m sure glad you have no say in the matter.
Looking at their post history, they left Mesa for American in April of this year. So they are very clearly stirring the pot with their BS staple ideology.
Akamai is offline  
Old 09-23-2024, 09:08 PM
  #152  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 166
Default

Originally Posted by Akamai
Looking at their post history, they left Mesa for American in April of this year. So they are very clearly stirring the pot with their BS staple ideology.
Expectations are DOH and fences for a few years. Dust settles and we move forword as a bigger better group and everyone makes more money.
Disappointment is offline  
Old 09-23-2024, 10:22 PM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Default

Originally Posted by Disappointment
Expectations are DOH and fences for a few years. Dust settles and we move forword as a bigger better group and everyone makes more money.
DOH… I know a lot of really smart people, like zero have said DOH. I would take that bet all day every day, zero chance this goes down DOH…zero!
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2024, 11:04 PM
  #154  
Hang gliding S of LAX VOR
 
Joined APC: Jan 2024
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Gunna be a hot take but I argue that any company being bought out of bankruptcy (or near bankruptcy) should be stapled to the bottom plain and simple.

We are in the middle of the largest hiring wave in the history of aviation and those guys chose to stay at a company that is failing. There was ample opportunity to leave and if the financially solvent party did not step in then you would be at the bottom anyways just not necessarily here.

Open to feedback but would love to hear how any sort of "integration" makes sense given current climate.
HOT HOT HOT!
EskimoBraddah69 is offline  
Old 09-23-2024, 11:24 PM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2023
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Disappointment
Expectations are DOH and fences for a few years. Dust settles and we move forword as a bigger better group and everyone makes more money.
Expectations on the Alaska side might equate to that. At HAL, expectations are better than relative seniority and 20+ year fences. Good thing the SLI will be arbitrated and we can all be upset and make more money together.
Akamai is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 07:58 AM
  #156  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jet J's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
Gunna be a hot take but I argue that any company being bought out of bankruptcy (or near bankruptcy) should be stapled to the bottom plain and simple.

We are in the middle of the largest hiring wave in the history of aviation and those guys chose to stay at a company that is failing. There was ample opportunity to leave and if the financially solvent party did not step in then you would be at the bottom anyways just not necessarily here.

Open to feedback but would love to hear how any sort of "integration" makes sense given current climate.
🤔 Would make sense. Do something similar to Southwest AirTran. The argument was AirTran pilots would make more stapled as WN FOs than they would as AirTran Captains.

Same with Hawaiian they will make more as FOs at Alaska than they would being on the street after BK at HA.
Jet J is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 08:42 AM
  #157  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Default

Originally Posted by Jet J
🤔 Would make sense. Do something similar to Southwest AirTran. The argument was AirTran pilots would make more stapled as WN FOs than they would as AirTran Captains.

Same with Hawaiian they will make more as FOs at Alaska than they would being on the street after BK at HA.
Objectively, I don't think HAL was on the verge of BK. Sans merger, they were potentially in for some pain, maybe even for a good while. That might have required a head-shed overhaul or maybe even a BOD overhaul, a la SWA/Elliot.

AS clearly has a much better financial trajectory going into this, but it is in fact a merger and not a fire sale. I would like to get some seniority credit since I came here largely so I could drive to work. I don't want to fly WB's at this point in life and don't expect to. But if there's a big WB shake-up necessitated by the flailing HAL business model I don't want a bunch of ex-WB pilots coming in on top of me in my home base.

I'd prefer DOH + relative seniority with tall WB fences. That protects the HAL people as long as the WB's are viable. I'd actually like fences on the AS bases too... everybody sticks with the horse they rode in on, for better or worse.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 08:58 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,791
Default

Outsider looking in... I don't think HA was in imminent danger of bankruptcy, and I think that argument is irrelevant as they were not in Ch 11 when the merger was announced.

I know ALK management said they intend to keep the WB flying... the question is for how long? Are you sure the new airline will be flying the WB's in 2034, or will it be an all-737MAX airline with all the WB's gone by the way of Virgin America's A320's? With that in mind, how do you integrate the lists? Is there an age gap between the two groups?

If I were a betting man, I'd bet on relative seniority merge with a 5 - 7 year fence on current WB's with caveat that any new delivered 787's post-merger is open to everyone based on seniority. This may kinda hose HA A330 pilots as those planes get retired.

Hope you guys get through this as quickly and as painlessly as possible.
RJSAviator76 is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 10:05 AM
  #159  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2023
Posts: 39
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Objectively, I don't think HAL was on the verge of BK. Sans merger, they were potentially in for some pain, maybe even for a good while. That might have required a head-shed overhaul or maybe even a BOD overhaul, a la SWA/Elliot.

AS clearly has a much better financial trajectory going into this, but it is in fact a merger and not a fire sale. I would like to get some seniority credit since I came here largely so I could drive to work. I don't want to fly WB's at this point in life and don't expect to. But if there's a big WB shake-up necessitated by the flailing HAL business model I don't want a bunch of ex-WB pilots coming in on top of me in my home base.

I'd prefer DOH + relative seniority with tall WB fences. That protects the HAL people as long as the WB's are viable. I'd actually like fences on the AS bases too... everybody sticks with the horse they rode in on, for better or worse.
We all choose where we work man and that comes with pluses and minuses. There were guys that loved air Tran or stayed there so they could drive to work just like you do.

Bottom line is what about guys who left the failing company to go work for the buying one?? They will end up lower than those who stayed at the failing one? Makes no sense. Pilots who work for a company that is going under then purchased should be happy to still be employed and would have been at the bottom of any list that would have them next regardless.
Point85ToTheFix is offline  
Old 09-24-2024, 10:44 AM
  #160  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Default

Originally Posted by Point85ToTheFix
We all choose where we work man and that comes with pluses and minuses. There were guys that loved air Tran or stayed there so they could drive to work just like you do.

Bottom line is what about guys who left the failing company to go work for the buying one?? They will end up lower than those who stayed at the failing one? Makes no sense. Pilots who work for a company that is going under then purchased should be happy to still be employed and would have been at the bottom of any list that would have them next regardless.
Sure. But that's very, very hard to quantify objectively.

The reality is that absent an actual BK filing (and maybe not even then) the arbitrator isn't going to weight it much, and the realtive financial positions of the companies isn't going to wash out the traditional ALPA SLI weight on category. Hopefully fences will protect what's what.

Debate about what's "fair" is just peeing into the wind in this context.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Aviation Technology
0
09-17-2022 10:21 AM
TXMike
Envoy Airlines
94
05-26-2022 02:25 PM
LCAL dude
United
1
11-27-2012 09:08 AM
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices