Search

Notices

AS/HA SLI Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2024, 06:28 PM
  #91  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,297
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
ALPA arbitrators aren't going to care because that its not a consideration for the SLI.
I thought they were supposed to consider that, but it's inherently very hard to quantify, so I would assume it wouldn't be heavily weighted.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 06:55 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
ALPA arbitrators aren't going to care because that its not a consideration for the SLI.
Nothing says that cannot be taken into consideration. Note "shall include but not be limited to". The arbitrator is free to use whatever additional metrics he deems appreciate.

Factors to be considered in constructing a fair and equitable integrated seniority list, in no particular order and with no particular weight, shall include but not be limited to the following:- Career expectations.- Longevity. - Status and category.
IFlyEm is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 10:14 PM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Please don’t fight. We need unity. And then when one side proposes 15% longevity and 85% relative, and the other side proposes 70% longevity and 30% relative, you’re still supposed to have unity and act lovey dovey.


Can’t wait to see the SLI proposals from both sides, while in the same breath telling us to maintain unity.
This is why the JCBA is first. Let’s focus on that first before the in-fighting starts.
DenainaPilot is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:17 PM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,212
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think the gist of what some AS people (including me to some degree) are concerned about is...

HA pilots granted better seniority to account for WB expectations, then...

a) Mainland resident HA pilots who are tired of the commute use their new seniority to come in on top of AS pilots in west coast bases. This is hypothetical of course but even 100-200 people would have a big impact. LAX is probably most concerning since that already got a big hit from VX integration.

.
it’s fair to want or feel entitled to wide bodies on the mainland, UNLESS there is a wide body reductions in Honolulu, hence the fences, Hence an arbitrator because lost jobs in Honolulu + lost job growth on the west coast = some unknown value.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:32 PM
  #95  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Yakattack
Yes. In this example, Spirit would be buying us, and I wouldn't dream of disrespecting their pilot group by claiming that DOH was unfair and that some A320 pilot from the purchasing airline who was actually hired before me should be junior to me because of my "higher" equipment type. I'm sure they are just as professional as I am. Show some respect.
It’s not about “WB elitism, disrespect, or tray tables”. I don’t give a damn if I fly a Cessna 172 as long as I still get my higher WB pay, one leg day, dozing for dollars, great layover destinations and schedule I signed up my whole career for.
Stardust is offline  
Old 09-18-2024, 11:43 PM
  #96  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think the gist of what some AS people (including me to some degree) are concerned about is...

HA pilots granted better seniority to account for WB expectations, then...

a) Mainland resident HA pilots who are tired of the commute use their new seniority to come in on top of AS pilots in west coast bases. This is hypothetical of course but even 100-200 people would have a big impact. LAX is probably most concerning since that already got a big hit from VX integration.

AND/OR

b) Route/fleet consolidation, boeing failure to deliver, etc driven musical chairs.


For those reasons I tend to prefer a DOH-ish solution with fences. In this case we might want to deviate from the norm and fence all bases or fleets. To the extent that OG pilots get first crack at their original fleets and then remaining vacancies go to whoever.

Of course HA pilots can be legit concerned about AS pilots coming for their WB's, but the usual ALPA process is known to address that.
An AS pilot concern for a HA pilot with a seniority boost moving into a mainland base is legit but very small in impacted number of pilots. Sure a few dozen might move but for every one that does a HNL slot opens up for an AS pilot that desires it (I know several who live in HI). Fair trade.

Every HA pilot will be impacted by the reduced WB ratio. There is no trade off for a HA pilot giving up a WB seat to a AS pilot. Every WB pilot has the seniority to be a NB pilot already and chose not to. If there is nothing to make up for that then seniority boosts and/or career long fences are a solution.
Stardust is offline  
Old 09-19-2024, 12:46 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by Stardust
An AS pilot concern for a HA pilot with a seniority boost moving into a mainland base is legit but very small in impacted number of pilots. Sure a few dozen might move but for every one that does a HNL slot opens up for an AS pilot that desires it (I know several who live in HI). Fair trade.

Every HA pilot will be impacted by the reduced WB ratio. There is no trade off for a HA pilot giving up a WB seat to a AS pilot. Every WB pilot has the seniority to be a NB pilot already and chose not to. If there is nothing to make up for that then seniority boosts and/or career long fences are a solution.
There is only one grease for a successful merger. Growth.

There is only one way to make aggrieved pilots feel better after a contentious SLI. Money.

If there is any sign of musical chairs, displacements, or other optimizations, this merger will implode and we can expect a period of disarray as morale plummets. A robust plan, deliveries, and growth is the only way that everyone keeps their head above water.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 09-19-2024, 05:35 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2024
Posts: 57
Default

think swa/airtrain
Uninteresting is offline  
Old 09-19-2024, 05:35 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,657
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
There is only one grease for a successful merger. Growth.

There is only one way to make aggrieved pilots feel better after a contentious SLI. Money.

If there is any sign of musical chairs, displacements, or other optimizations, this merger will implode and we can expect a period of disarray as morale plummets. A robust plan, deliveries, and growth is the only way that everyone keeps their head above water.
Growth can only happen with a strong economic outlook. Undisciplined growth is a disaster for both airlines and airline employees. There are some good economic signs but also more potential black swans than at any time in the history of airlines. Cross your fingers and hope none come to fruition.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-19-2024, 06:08 AM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 730
Default

We also can't grow because we can not get additional aircraft at a substantial enough rate.
GoodJet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rickair7777
Aviation Technology
0
09-17-2022 10:21 AM
TXMike
Envoy Airlines
94
05-26-2022 02:25 PM
LCAL dude
United
1
11-27-2012 09:08 AM
EWR73FO
United
5
03-16-2012 08:04 AM
bull
Southwest
172
07-27-2011 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices