Search

Notices

787 routes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2024, 11:18 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,586
Default

Originally Posted by AKCattleCarrier
No chance. took 7 years to retire the airbuses. 3 years to close the JFK base. When the merger closed in 2016 we had 219 mainline tails. At the close of '23 we had 232. 13 tails of growth in 7 years. Only now in '24 are we starting to see organic growth in the # of tails with the VA merger firmly behind us and all those pilots digested into the system. This merger is infinitely more complicated than the VA merger and to my eyes HA seems significantly overstaffed.

Your stuck for the forseeable future. For those that are happy with their place on the seniority list thats fine. For those that are stuck on reserve, just short of upgrade, stuck flying trips they hate etc. Its a disaster. For a new hire looking at options, wouldn't touch this place with a 10' pole. AS probably won't need many anyway.
So you think this merger is going to go exactly like the last? Lol man.
word302 is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 11:28 AM
  #52  
Line Holder
 
AKCattleCarrier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2023
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by word302
So you think this merger is going to go exactly like the last? Lol man.
Like I said, this merger is infinitely more complicated. Way more variables, way higher probability that unforseen circumstances of various integration decisions have detrimental effects on this pilot group. What you call "takes" are actually well thought out statements based on past precedent of this company, the history of mergers in this country, and objectively looking at the variables at play and how they will effect (affect?) pilot careers. One line little quips without thougt out explanation of your position are in fact "takes".
AKCattleCarrier is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 11:42 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,586
Default

Originally Posted by AKCattleCarrier
Like I said, this merger is infinitely more complicated. Way more variables, way higher probability that unforseen circumstances of various integration decisions have detrimental effects on this pilot group. What you call "takes" are actually well thought out statements based on past precedent of this company, the history of mergers in this country, and objectively looking at the variables at play and how they will effect (affect?) pilot careers. One line little quips without thougt out explanation of your position are in fact "takes".
k..........
word302 is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 11:56 AM
  #54  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by AKCattleCarrier
I think this conversation assumes we are not about to acquire 1100 pilots that are about to have their fleet and route structures flipped on its head. What percentage did we decide commute from the manland? No one seems to know for sure but its high. Staffing is not going to be a problem for a long time. Hiring is not going to be a problem for a long time except for replacing people off the bottom to cover attrition as they realize upgrade times are way longer, seniority progression is way slower, base and fleet options are lower than our legacy peers.

Problems:
- Displacement bids from retiring fleets
- Shrinking HNL base
- "Unknown" future of Amazon flying (I bet all those folks live on the mainland)

Unless BM has a secret plan that opens more mainland bases or something this place is going to be a stagnated disaster for pilots for a decade.
Why on earth would they shrink the HNL base? What fleet is retiring that also includes shrinking? This is a bit silly...
MinRest is online now  
Old 07-13-2024, 12:13 PM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
AKCattleCarrier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2023
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Why on earth would they shrink the HNL base? What fleet is retiring that also includes shrinking? This is a bit silly...
- I believe having wide bodies based solely in HNL is unlikely, limits their destination use and their customer base.
- I believe 717s are likely to be retired asap and inter-island flying is likely to be integrated into the current 737 etops structure (i.e done more effciently with bigger airplanes and less pilots).
- 321s and 737s? Past precendent shows AS doesn't want to keep two fleets with overlapping capability.
- 787s and 330's? Past precendent shows AS doesn't want to keep two fleets that have overlapping capability.
- HAs unprofitable route structure is bound to be slashed through to profitability (ala VAs), what that looks like only ST knows. But the $/Yen chart doesn't bode well for the Japanese tourist returning anytime soon.
- Amazon flying - I believe it is unlikely AS will want to staff airplanes they don't own and that subjects them to the whims of the greatest (and famously ruthless) cost cutting logistics operator of all time. (HA is staffing this flying as we speak)
- Both airlines are fully staffed (overstaffed?) and historically merger math is 1+1 = 1.5-1.8 once all the :"inntegrations" and "synergies" etc are found and capitalized on.
AKCattleCarrier is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 12:21 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 103
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
Why on earth would they shrink the HNL base? What fleet is retiring that also includes shrinking? This is a bit silly...
What will hiring and attrition look like when HNL is the junior base to sit reserve on the 717?
SFO will look so much better…
JLAMS16 is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 12:50 PM
  #57  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2022
Position: PT-17, Rear
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by AKCattleCarrier
- I believe having wide bodies based solely in HNL is unlikely, limits their destination use and their customer base.
- I believe 717s are likely to be retired asap and inter-island flying is likely to be integrated into the current 737 etops structure (i.e done more effciently with bigger airplanes and less pilots).
- 321s and 737s? Past precendent shows AS doesn't want to keep two fleets with overlapping capability.
- 787s and 330's? Past precendent shows AS doesn't want to keep two fleets that have overlapping capability.
- HAs unprofitable route structure is bound to be slashed through to profitability (ala VAs), what that looks like only ST knows. But the $/Yen chart doesn't bode well for the Japanese tourist returning anytime soon.
- Amazon flying - I believe it is unlikely AS will want to staff airplanes they don't own and that subjects them to the whims of the greatest (and famously ruthless) cost cutting logistics operator of all time. (HA is staffing this flying as we speak)
- Both airlines are fully staffed (overstaffed?) and historically merger math is 1+1 = 1.5-1.8 once all the :"inntegrations" and "synergies" etc are found and capitalized on.

Flying bigger airplanes less often isn’t really a solution for the interisland market.

The $/¥ is a red herring because there’s choke Japanese folks traveling to Hawaii. Flights are full and it’s not all Americans traveling the other direction.

My litmus test is a friends’ Japanese language surf school that’s completely booked. When they start having openings I’ll be a little more concerned about the Japanese market.
Capo2ndFret is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 01:00 PM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
AKCattleCarrier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2023
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by Capo2ndFret
Flying bigger airplanes less often isn’t really a solution for the interisland market.

The $/¥ is a red herring because there’s choke Japanese folks traveling to Hawaii. Flights are full and it’s not all Americans traveling the other direction.

My litmus test is a friends’ Japanese language surf school that’s completely booked. When they start having openings I’ll be a little more concerned about the Japanese market.
I didn't say less often, I said more efficiently, SWA is proving it works. If it makes sense on a spreadsheet AS will do it.

A red herring argument would be citing a circumstantial local surf school as evidence for Japanese Tourist numbers. the $/Yen chart is data.
https://www.sfgate.com/hawaii/articl...y-19420418.php
https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/05/it...ourism-market/

PS real guitar players don't use capos (I kid), I have one on every guitar.
AKCattleCarrier is offline  
Old 07-13-2024, 01:02 PM
  #59  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by JLAMS16
What will hiring and attrition look like when HNL is the junior base to sit reserve on the 717?
SFO will look so much better…
HNL is the junior base to sit reserve on the 717 already...
MinRest is online now  
Old 07-13-2024, 01:22 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,155
Default

Originally Posted by AKCattleCarrier
I didn't say less often, I said more efficiently, SWA is proving it works. If it makes sense on a spreadsheet AS will do it.

A red herring argument would be citing a circumstantial local surf school as evidence for Japanese Tourist numbers. the $/Yen chart is data.
https://www.sfgate.com/hawaii/articl...y-19420418.php
https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/05/it...ourism-market/

PS real guitar players don't use capos (I kid), I have one on every guitar.
SWA is suffering major inter island losses and consumers need frequency. SWA dumped all this capacity into wipe out Hawaiian and monopolize the market.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Foreign
10
10-10-2013 04:49 AM
EWR73FO
Major
32
02-25-2013 04:46 PM
CANAM
Regional
57
03-02-2011 11:10 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-04-2005 08:06 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-16-2005 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices