Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska buying Hawaiian airlines. >

Alaska buying Hawaiian airlines.

Search

Notices

Alaska buying Hawaiian airlines.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2024, 11:24 PM
  #991  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PineappleXpres's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,224
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The science of management (bean counting). That's certainly the history.

But the best road to success is actually art AND science... the art is in the intangible hard-to-quantify human factors. Such as the future retention and recruiting impact of goodwill, or badwill.

The art component has to be carefully constrained though. Too much of that gets you way out on a limb where 5% succeed in a spectacular fashion and earn the "visionary" honorific. While the other 95% fail spectacularly.
Alaska just bought a very artistic airline. Guess it was the first time.
PineappleXpres is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 05:47 AM
  #992  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: The Jet
Posts: 1,132
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I think they'll be displacing a bunch of unfilled vacancies. Otherwise it's a furlough because junior SFO FO's can't displace anyone.
There are no vacancies right now. Alaska always reduces the bit afterwards to clean up the vacancies. This is the real problem with the way we do bidding here. 3-4 bids a yea maximum and we really don't have an idea of the demand for a base in a given seat as the vacancies are deleted.
MinRest is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 07:12 AM
  #993  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,406
Default

Originally Posted by MinRest
There are no vacancies right now. Alaska always reduces the bit afterwards to clean up the vacancies. This is the real problem with the way we do bidding here. 3-4 bids a yea maximum and we really don't have an idea of the demand for a base in a given seat as the vacancies are deleted.
I should have said this in the first place: Just because they "cleaned up" vacancies doesn't mean they don't need bodies there.

They have another option too... let folks bid where they want (aside from ANC) and then build the trips to cover the SFO flying from other bases. They can readily do that from most of the other bases, but ANC is probably too far with limited trips to the lower 48. Might even help retention if folks can live where they want to (or not live where they don't want to).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 07:58 AM
  #994  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: PIC
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I should have said this in the first place: Just because they "cleaned up" vacancies doesn't mean they don't need bodies there.

They have another option too... let folks bid where they want (aside from ANC) and then build the trips to cover the SFO flying from other bases. They can readily do that from most of the other bases, but ANC is probably too far with limited trips to the lower 48. Might even help retention if folks can live where they want to (or not live where they don't want to).
This is the right way. Have a larger portion of ANC trips start with the first leg to SEA and enter the system that way. Have some more PDX and LAX trips start by going to SFO and then flying more. Sounds like a great way to tack more credit onto a transcon. Not DHs, which we have seen some of when SFO is short staffed. Build it into the flying schedule.

It would make longer trips though, and the majority want shorter 1- and 2-days. I would rather get more productive and longer duration trips.
polymox is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 09:12 AM
  #995  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Precarious
Posts: 388
Default

Originally Posted by polymox
This is the right way. Have a larger portion of ANC trips start with the first leg to SEA and enter the system that way. Have some more PDX and LAX trips start by going to SFO and then flying more. Sounds like a great way to tack more credit onto a transcon. Not DHs, which we have seen some of when SFO is short staffed. Build it into the flying schedule.

It would make longer trips though, and the majority want shorter 1- and 2-days. I would rather get more productive and longer duration trips.
This doesn't solve their current imbalance of first officers in SFO. With our current low attrition and no vacancies in other bases, forcing some FO to SFO might help that for a short time at the cost of more attrition.
conquestdz is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:17 AM
  #996  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 751
Default

So if this means no downgrades which has come up more than once this year on company communications. This rumor would result in 25 ANC based FOs bidding for SEA logically as it would be the shortest commute for ANC FOs who live in ANC. That means the 25 most JR FOs in SEA will get bumped down to SFO.
GoodJet is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:34 AM
  #997  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Default

Originally Posted by GoodJet
So if this means no downgrades which has come up more than once this year on company communications. This rumor would result in 25 ANC based FOs bidding for SEA logically as it would be the shortest commute for ANC FOs who live in ANC. That means the 25 most JR FOs in SEA will get bumped down to SFO.
Really you believe this crap… LCA, oh my really, tell me more. All of that is absolute garbage. I have heard talk of FO TDY in SFO. I was asked about my thoughts on a SFO fix in early June. I told him, I would close the base and shift the flying to SEA, LAX, and PDX… at first I got a funny look, I got a text a few days latter, planning is now crunching numbers on the idea. I think 60/40 chance SFO could close 2/1/25… That is not a joke, that is not garbage!
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:40 AM
  #998  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 722
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Really you believe this crap… LCA, oh my really, tell me more. All of that is absolute garbage. I have heard talk of FO TDY in SFO. I was asked about my thoughts on a SFO fix in early June. I told him, I would close the base and shift the flying to SEA, LAX, and PDX… at first I got a funny look, I got a text a few days latter, planning is now crunching numbers on the idea. I think 60/40 chance SFO could close 2/1/25… That is not a joke, that is not garbage!
We're back to this bs?

Remember when you were all about SFO closing and then they doubled the base size?

I do. You're full of sh*t and always have been.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:48 AM
  #999  
Line Holder
 
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Captain
Posts: 336
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
Really you believe this crap… LCA, oh my really, tell me more. All of that is absolute garbage. I have heard talk of FO TDY in SFO. I was asked about my thoughts on a SFO fix in early June. I told him, I would close the base and shift the flying to SEA, LAX, and PDX… at first I got a funny look, I got a text a few days latter, planning is now crunching numbers on the idea. I think 60/40 chance SFO could close 2/1/25… That is not a joke, that is not garbage!
why would they close SFO new terminal starting tomorrow with more gates than the T2 terminal. It’s bigger than ANC and with Hawaiian airlines coming into the mix we will have their flying out of sfo. Why would they close a base that’s bigger and flys more block hours than ANC? And Pdx is only bigger by about 2000 block hours

closing sfo does not make sense. Talk about way for people to just leave for united
Jetlikespeed is offline  
Old 06-18-2024, 11:51 AM
  #1000  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,241
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
We're back to this bs?

Remember when you were all about SFO closing and then they doubled the base size?

I do. You're full of sh*t and always have been.
There have been 3 other times in the last 8 years when AS has considered closing SFO. You’re a moron if you think that this is not true. Flight Ops sent out a message confirming this fact, stating they needed time to make the right decision for all parties. CLOSING SFO IS DEFINITELY ON THE TABLE ONCE AGAIN!

And I ain’t getting my info from some dumb LCA… remember the last LCA quoted on here when asked about 787🤔😉😂 Who did he say you needed to stop listening too…
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutsourceNoMo
American
52
09-24-2023 11:35 AM
flybywire44
American
57
02-12-2015 03:46 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 01:50 PM
vagabond
Major
37
09-09-2008 03:19 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
12-08-2005 07:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices