Search

Notices

TA is here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2023, 01:10 PM
  #561  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Your worth is limited by your lack of career portability and the seniority system. Fact.

Management doesn’t need to make you happy, they just need enough to stop the sub 4 yr guys leaving, which is where the overwhelming majority of attrition lies.
​​​​​​"Career portability and the seniority system?" So by that logic... the pilots at Delta and American, who are much less likely to leave than Alaska pilots, must be worth less? And yet somehow they knew that the "average up" BS wasn't good enough and demanded something better.

"Career portability and the seniority system" doesn't explain why 82% of us settled for contract language with a hole in it big enough to drive a bus through.
echelon is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 01:10 PM
  #562  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
In my observations, there are 3 types of pilots here who are willing to work for less.

Bad. The pilot who cannot recognize weak contract language or doesn't do due diligence to assure that the contract will perform as intended.

Worse. The pilot who doesn't care about industry parity as long as he is a top dog among Alaska Airlines pilots. As long as he is crushing it against his company peers, then he'd prefer to not be aware of other airlines outperforming him.

Worst. The pilot who actually wants to work for less because it's "good for the company."

Which one are you?
This seems like something flyprdu would write, who conveniently hasn’t posted since Nov 2022. But reluctant Eskimo comes out of nowhere in April. Weird. Did you just finally discover APC after all these years?


In any case. Assuming you weren’t trolling, to answer your question, ALL the stories you hear of Delta guys making absolute bank are guys who are milking the system and taking advantage of every nugget. But when AS pilots write doing similar, it’s met with disdain. I’m “Good” = taking advantage of everything possible in the current contract to maximize the time at home while maximizing pay at work.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 01:24 PM
  #563  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

Originally Posted by echelon
​​​​​​"Career portability and the seniority system?" So by that logic... the pilots at Delta and American, who are much less likely to leave than Alaska pilots, must be worth less? And yet somehow they knew that the "average up" BS wasn't good enough.

"Career portability and the seniority system" doesn't explain why 82% of us settled for contract language with a hole in it big enough to drive a bus through.
They are bigger companies with bigger fleets, larger models, larger route network, breadth, revenues, market cap, and just about every measurable quantity. AS just isn’t the same. Reminds me of the men vs soccer women pay parity issue. “We’re playing the same sport!” Yes, you are. But it’s all about what you bring in. Your tickets, your revenues, your crowds are nowhere close compared to the other.




82% said yes because the union fought for the cornerstone issues we asked them (eg, scope). I don’t recall people asking/demanding snap up provisions. This contract met the requirements of what we were asking for. You’ll get 318 Sept 1 as worse case and then Sept 2024 will be more than 331.



What hope you referring to? The pilot group asked for 3 large groups for this contract. We met that goal. Having a snap up was never discussed
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 01:39 PM
  #564  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Having a snap up was never discussed
I guess you missed the road shows.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 01:40 PM
  #565  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
ALL the stories you hear of Delta guys making absolute bank are guys who are milking the system and taking advantage of every nugget. But when AS pilots write doing similar, it’s met with disdain. I’m “Good” = taking advantage of everything possible in the current contract to maximize the time at home while maximizing pay at work.
Delta pilots have earned their right to make bank, because they have an industry leading contract. When an Alaska pilot makes bank, while simultaneously praising the 10% Alaska discount, then there's a problem.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 01:50 PM
  #566  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
82% said yes because the union fought for the cornerstone issues we asked them (eg, scope). I don’t recall people asking/demanding snap up provisions. This contract met the requirements of what we were asking for. You’ll get 318 Sept 1 as worse case and then Sept 2024 will be more than 331.



What hope you referring to? The pilot group asked for 3 large groups for this contract. We met that goal. Having a snap up was never discussed
One, speak for yourself - It's funny to think back on when "5th best" was a rallying cry for this group now that we'll soon be a distant 7th or 8th (AFTER a round of negotiations!), but anyway, 6 years ago when that was a thing it was clear that preventing ourselves from being relegated to last place, or close to it, was important. It was a priority for me and my rep knew that.

And two - The ENTIRE contract was open for negotiations. If pilots weren't asking the NC/reps for enough, including a snap up provision, isn't that the problem?
echelon is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 02:33 PM
  #567  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

We asked for 4 cornerstone areas. They delivered. The angry crowd is just peeved the big 3 got/getting more. In fact, there was even a rallying cry to now intentionally delay and stall from the union side to see what others would get first.


Some people will just never be happy. And the grass really isn’t that much greener. If you reallly believed it was, you would have left Virgin/Alaska a while ago.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 02:46 PM
  #568  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2023
Posts: 719
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
In fact, there was even a rallying cry to now intentionally delay and stall from the union side to see what others would get first.
You keep bringing this up like it's some victory for you. All of your pre-CBA forecasts were wildly incorrect. There was no recession. The majors delivered within weeks, not years, after our announcement. Waiting for stronger unions to clear a path would have resulted in a much better contract. We left tens of thousands on the table.

This thread is a time capsule of bad takes by you.
ReluctantEskimo is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 02:53 PM
  #569  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
You keep bringing this up like it's some victory for you. All of your pre-CBA forecasts were wildly incorrect. There was no recession. The majors delivered within weeks, not years, after our announcement. Waiting for stronger unions to clear a path would have resulted in a much better contract. We left tens of thousands on the table.

This thread is a time capsule of bad takes by you.
prdu, is that you? Same old cry. We ain’t out of the woods yet on the recession topic.


The majors delivered, only JetBlue, American, and Delta. Your rallying cry when United TA 1 was voted down, that TA would be 2 weeks around the corner. Been over a year now. Nothing.

Like it or not, it’s unlikely SW and UA get new contracts in place by Sept 1.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 06-25-2023, 02:55 PM
  #570  
What's a weekend?
 
Avgeek7248's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Widget FO
Posts: 485
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
They are bigger companies with bigger fleets, larger models, larger route network, breadth, revenues, market cap, and just about every measurable quantity. AS just isn’t the same. Reminds me of the men vs soccer women pay parity issue. “We’re playing the same sport!” Yes, you are. But it’s all about what you bring in. Your tickets, your revenues, your crowds are nowhere close compared to the other.




82% said yes because the union fought for the cornerstone issues we asked them (eg, scope). I don’t recall people asking/demanding snap up provisions. This contract met the requirements of what we were asking for. You’ll get 318 Sept 1 as worse case and then Sept 2024 will be more than 331.



What hope you referring to? The pilot group asked for 3 large groups for this contract. We met that goal. Having a snap up was never discussed
Sure they’re much bigger and make a lot more revenue. But one thing AS does better is make money hand over fist. They’re by no means struggling to get by profit wise.
Avgeek7248 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices