Search

Notices

TA is here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2022, 11:44 AM
  #381  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by dracir1
Well since you've got your chest all poked out, I'll bite...

Can you explain the difference between "average" min day and min day? What impact does it have for the company in terms of payment. Give an example of a 2 day pairing that would be affected and how.

AvWriterJoe is currently occupied and unable to respond. AWJ is frantically scouring the internet "doing research".
chuck416 is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 12:08 PM
  #382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416
AvWriterJoe is currently occupied and unable to respond. AWJ is frantically scouring the internet "doing research".
My money is on AvWriterJoe being a Pakistani freelancer OTZEagle is paying 50 cents per post to cover for him while he’s out flying today.
Lewbronski is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 12:40 PM
  #383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
And that isn't fear mongering? Your side is attacking those who are saying the Fed is continuing to raise interest rates and control crash the economy for 2023. Your side calls this pessimist, can't predict the future, and stop being scared of what could happen to the economy. Sounds like you want to control the narrative and fear only what you deem is worth fearing.

So in essence, you write our views off on a year just 3 months away. But you are absolutely convinced about something for 2026 and beyond.
As someone who loves data, you can see the retirements in black and white.

It's not speculation. It's reality. The retirement peak will have passed by the time we get a new new contract.

You're predicting things that might happen. I'm showing things that are already scheduled to happen.

Know the difference.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:08 PM
  #384  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 20
Wink

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Can you explain why the E-175 is a serious threat to a mainline 737 driver? Much more so than a Q-400?
The E-175 is a smaller 737 - similar in range, multi-class seating and flies at about the same speeds. It's tempting to use the E175s on some 737 routes. Hence the need for the STRONG scope protections this time around.

Good question.
AvwriterJoe is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:10 PM
  #385  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Sep 2022
Posts: 20
Wink

Originally Posted by Lewbronski
My money is on AvWriterJoe being a Pakistani freelancer OTZEagle is paying 50 cents per post to cover for him while he’s out flying today.
Definitely not Pakistani.

The OP had an unclear question.

Also I am 100% not management. If I was management, I'd be posting here a long time before now instead of playing DCS World.
AvwriterJoe is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:16 PM
  #386  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,817
Default

Originally Posted by AvwriterJoe
The E-175 is a smaller 737 - similar in range, multi-class seating and flies at about the same speeds. It's tempting to use the E175s on some 737 routes. Hence the need for the STRONG scope protections this time around.

Good question.
I’m satisfied. And while the company has promised for literally decades to abide by industry standard scope, they’ve bled us dry with a thousand little cuts. One of the most egregious is bringing on 175’s with a higher MGTOW of 89K pounds, making it truly capable of replacing every one of us. Our TA’s scope language allows them to keep flying nearly forty at this higher-than-industry-standard weight and is completely unacceptable. They’re being rewarded for their crooked labor practices and I cannot vote yes in good conscience.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:50 PM
  #387  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
As someone who loves data, you can see the retirements in black and white.

It's not speculation. It's reality. The retirement peak will have passed by the time we get a new new contract.

You're predicting things that might happen. I'm showing things that are already scheduled to happen.

Know the difference.
I'm not predicting what might happen, it IS what is happening. When you raise interest rates, you raise borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. As a result, they spend less, take less loans, grow less, and the economic output decreases. That is all fact. It isn't speculation, it is reality. This is the Fed's state goal. It's how they plan to reduce inflation. They can't affect the supply side, they can only affect the demand side. And that is precisely what they are doing. And if you have noticed, the GDP output for the last two quarters has been negative which is the usual definition of a recession.


I have to remind myself, I'm arguing with the most vocal angry voice on APC and Alyeska, and on financial matters at that (bad combo). You do you and vote no. Hey, I heard if you vote NO everyday from Oct 3 - 17, your NO vote will count 15 times. And if it passes, you could always do an insurrection at the Alaska MEC office to "stop the steal."

Debating with you is useless, I don't even know why I fall for it. Shame on me.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 01:57 PM
  #388  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'm not predicting what might happen, it IS what is happening. When you raise interest rates, you raise borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. As a result, they spend less, take less loans, grow less, and the economic output decreases. That is all fact. It isn't speculation, it is reality. This is the Fed's state goal. It's how they plan to reduce inflation. They can't affect the supply side, they can only affect the demand side. And that is precisely what they are doing. And if you have noticed, the GDP output for the last two quarters has been negative which is the usual definition of a recession.


I have to remind myself, I'm arguing with the most vocal angry voice on APC and Alyeska, and on financial matters at that (bad combo). You do you and vote no. Hey, I heard if you vote NO everyday from Oct 3 - 17, your NO vote will count 15 times. And if it passes, you could always do an insurrection at the Alaska MEC office to "stop the steal."

Debating with you is useless, I don't even know why I fall for it. Shame on me.
You seem a little unhinged. Perhaps you should take a break.

What I have a problem with your assessment of the Federal Reserve is how you think it will impact pilot hiring demand. You're connecting a lot of dots that aren't filled in. And that's called speculation.

The pilot shortage trumps all. Even high interest rates.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 02:31 PM
  #389  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,933
Default

Having your head in the sand is one way to go about life. I choose to look at the economic indicators for predicting airline health. Retirements is just one part of the puzzle.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-30-2022, 02:55 PM
  #390  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
I’m satisfied. And while the company has promised for literally decades to abide by industry standard scope, they’ve bled us dry with a thousand little cuts. One of the most egregious is bringing on 175’s with a higher MGTOW of 89K pounds, making it truly capable of replacing every one of us. Our TA’s scope language allows them to keep flying nearly forty at this higher-than-industry-standard weight and is completely unacceptable. They’re being rewarded for their crooked labor practices and I cannot vote yes in good conscience.

You do realize Delta has 30+ 89k EMB 175s flying around right?
CordovaCA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices