Alaska General Discussion
#521
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 669
Absolutely not. But thanks for trying to start a purse fight online. Management is causing this reduction and likely downgrades and reduced QOL on both seats for jr pilots. It’s not any pilots fault. I don’t even see how this would be a reasonable take on what I mentioned but hey it’s APC after all…
I’d say a reasonable way to avoid this would be to slow the roll on the bus wind down. Ideally growing the LAX base in line to replace the bus. The most reasonable explanation as to why this reduction bid is going the way it’s going is management does not care about the pilot group or even pilot retention for that matter.
But way to make about infighting.
I’d say a reasonable way to avoid this would be to slow the roll on the bus wind down. Ideally growing the LAX base in line to replace the bus. The most reasonable explanation as to why this reduction bid is going the way it’s going is management does not care about the pilot group or even pilot retention for that matter.
But way to make about infighting.
#522
Absolutely not. But thanks for trying to start a purse fight online. Management is causing this reduction and likely downgrades and reduced QOL on both seats for jr pilots. It’s not any pilots fault. I don’t even see how this would be a reasonable take on what I mentioned but hey it’s APC after all…
I’d say a reasonable way to avoid this would be to slow the roll on the bus wind down. Ideally growing the LAX base in line to replace the bus. The most reasonable explanation as to why this reduction bid is going the way it’s going is management does not care about the pilot group or even pilot retention for that matter.
But way to make about infighting.
I’d say a reasonable way to avoid this would be to slow the roll on the bus wind down. Ideally growing the LAX base in line to replace the bus. The most reasonable explanation as to why this reduction bid is going the way it’s going is management does not care about the pilot group or even pilot retention for that matter.
But way to make about infighting.
#523
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 658
I think it’s extremely telling you quote zero source of leverage. No koala, a voice is not leverage. You’re just another seniority number. As long as the pilots show up and the planes move, there is no pressure. The only leverage is walking with your feet, and that is nearly impossible in a seniority system with golden handcuffs. A union has power, but not in the way you’re thinking.
#524
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,914
🙄 Right, nobody has any leverage, definitely not Delta, who doesn't have anything remotely close to our attrition/attraction/retention problems... So how do you explain how they nonetheless managed to negotiate QOL and pay gains that blow our new contract out of the water?
Because that’s Delta. $320/hr 777 top Capt rate prior to 9/11.
Historically speaking, the big legacy carriers have always had higher payrates, except for the post 9/11 BK era when SW ruled.
Last edited by ShyGuy; 05-31-2023 at 09:06 PM.
#525
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,914
#526
#527
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 40
Completely honest rational question. No emotion behind it as you are often concerned about.
Alaska went first.
As a young Shy was sitting around in the fall of 2022 with no other comparable airlines having a new contract, would you have voted for the company's proposal of $280 or did you think you deserved more?
I'd like you to publicly state what you would've done
Fair enough?
Alaska went first.
As a young Shy was sitting around in the fall of 2022 with no other comparable airlines having a new contract, would you have voted for the company's proposal of $280 or did you think you deserved more?
I'd like you to publicly state what you would've done
Fair enough?
#528
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
There is nothing more stagnating to pilot seniority than being all on the same line. The full impact of the merger is landing on Oct 1st.
#529
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,914
Completely honest rational question. No emotion behind it as you are often concerned about.
Alaska went first.
As a young Shy was sitting around in the fall of 2022 with no other comparable airlines having a new contract, would you have voted for the company's proposal of $280 or did you think you deserved more?
I'd like you to publicly state what you would've done
Fair enough?
Alaska went first.
As a young Shy was sitting around in the fall of 2022 with no other comparable airlines having a new contract, would you have voted for the company's proposal of $280 or did you think you deserved more?
I'd like you to publicly state what you would've done
Fair enough?
No, I wouldn’t have voted yes for $280. That was at the time lower than the industry $285ish the legacy carriers had. Our new contract had to exceed those, $306 was fine for a start, but also realizing the big 3 airlines would get a higher number once they got their new contract. $280 would be silly. AS launched the new cycle of pilot contracts. It obviously had to go above the industry $285 at the time (and apparently still the case).
We can argue about the average snap ups all day long. I’d rather have it than not. Who would have predicted UA would take this long? 2023 will most likely be a wash and go to $318 but 2024 should be a nice/decent bump above $331.
#530
The problem has no cure. We are ending up as a single fleet type with one mega base and 4 sub-bases that have very little origination flying. All of it in the same time zone. (ANC is essentially in the same time zone).
There is nothing more stagnating to pilot seniority than being all on the same line. The full impact of the merger is landing on Oct 1st.
There is nothing more stagnating to pilot seniority than being all on the same line. The full impact of the merger is landing on Oct 1st.
We got a slight reprieve with the new contract implementation, as it temp slowed attrition, but, as of now, we STILL don’t have adequate reserves and now since we agreed to an MOU that won’t allow trading out of a redeye into anything other that another redeye, trip trading is still horrible. LAX, the most commutable base has been shrunk to the point that, it’s still the most commutable, but also the lousiest pairings/trips. What’s left of LAX is soon about to experience a backward slide in seniority because of the Airbus dump. SFO expansion is a non-starter unless you live in base or happen to have a (rare) commutable city. And Alaska philosophy of “growth” is the unwavering “more seats, more frequency, more Seattle”.
As an aside, you’ll quite possibly be wearing the stupidest pilot uniform ever created in the near future.
Now, if you’re cool with that… long term, short term, whatever… come on… we’ll get ready for the next negotiation. Otherwise, do yourself a favor and set your sights higher. It just is what it is, and the union, even a strong one, won’t change the fundamentals of why we’re last.
We DO make money. Lot’s of it. So, there is THAT.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post