Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska General Discussion >

Alaska General Discussion

Search

Notices

Alaska General Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2022, 05:00 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

As an aside, everyone who is putting faith in a me too clause to save us is setting us up for disappointment.

We work for a company that has a history of exploiting loopholes and contract violations.

Everyone is taking a huge gamble that the snap up won't be covered in secret sauce.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-06-2022, 06:00 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
As an aside, everyone who is putting faith in a me too clause to save us is setting us up for disappointment.

We work for a company that has a history of exploiting loopholes and contract violations.

Everyone is taking a huge gamble that the snap up won't be covered in secret sauce.

Things that will never "snap up:" Credit value of a vacation day, rate of sick leave accrual, days off for reserves, daily credit guarantee/rigs, PBS credit window, credit value for involuntary schedule changes and the circumstances under which that can happen in the first place, the standards by which ARC is calculated and applied, etc ETC. Every piece of the puzzle, including but not limited to pay rates, is important.
echelon is offline  
Old 09-06-2022, 08:26 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 677
Default

The union has repeatedly stated that the pilot body's expressed items of importance is at the core of their negotiating strategy. They have also mentioned that they're in constant contact with their counterparts at the other airlines to ensure that we're in the ballpark with everyone else, thereby not potentially leaving money on the table.

Because of this MEC's and NC's particular diligence, if we are first with a TA, I don’t think we'll end up crying in our beers, after seeing what the others end up getting.
All Bizniz is offline  
Old 09-06-2022, 08:53 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Posts: 665
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I am curious, what am I pretending to know? We have an incredible negotiating team, an awesome MEC, I am hopeful right now. It does look like we will not have a unanimous favorable vote out of our MEC though🙄.

My understanding is a rate has been agreed too, our bonus is miles apart right now. JR manning, p/u, and reassignment pay should be worked next week. Sharing any numbers, wether they are accurate or not will only create turmoil. I am hopeful we will cross the finish line this week or next. The schmuck clause will hopefully protect us, should our analysis be way off.

And since I know nothing this shouldn’t bother anyone. I was told QX is in the final stages of being sold😱. November everyone, NOVEMBER!
Did you not just deny you have access to privileged information at the beginning of your post and then add more alleged inside information at the end of your post? Am I misinterpreting what you are trying to say here?
GoodJet is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 07:11 AM
  #25  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Default

Originally Posted by echelon
Things that will never "snap up:" Credit value of a vacation day, rate of sick leave accrual, days off for reserves, daily credit guarantee/rigs, PBS credit window, credit value for involuntary schedule changes and the circumstances under which that can happen in the first place, the standards by which ARC is calculated and applied, etc ETC. Every piece of the puzzle, including but not limited to pay rates, is important.
You could include a laundry list of all those snap up items, and more. At the cost of economic negotiating capital (and likely time, while managers recover from shocked paralysis caused by confronting a new reality). Call your rep.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 07:43 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You could include a laundry list of all those snap up items, and more. At the cost of economic negotiating capital (and likely time, while managers recover from shocked paralysis caused by confronting a new reality). Call your rep.
It's a fool's errand to vote yes today on a subpar contract with the hopes that it will magically improve by an unknown amount later.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 07:57 AM
  #27  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,992
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
It's a fool's errand to vote yes today on a subpar contract with the hopes that it will magically improve by an unknown amount later.
Who the hell said vote yes on a subpar contract??? Nobody here (not even OTZ, I think). Is it always necessary to wait for the big boys to do the heavy lifting? That could take a while...

Also, AS is the ONLY legacy which flies ONLY narrowbodies. That's a unique market niche, so plagiarizing somebody else's CBA is never going to get it exactly right. Standup on your own two feet and take care of your own business.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 08:01 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2021
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by flyprdu
It's a fool's errand to vote yes today on a subpar contract with the hopes that it will magically improve by an unknown amount later.
I’m not sure why you are so spooked to get this done. The MEC has stated multiple times that they are in close contact with reps representing the other carriers to insure we are in line with our peers in negotiations.

Seriously, take a chill pill and trust the process and people we currently have working for us.
ChickenFinger is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 08:22 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

We're all talking hypotheticals here, right?

The idea of filling the contract full of IOUs is a bad one. It allows the pilot group to not vote for the contract on its face, but the pilots get to inject all their hopes and dreams into their decision making.

Nevermind the fact that it opens up the door to management interpretation and implementation delays. 3rd step anyone?

We'll find out soon how good a job the NC has done. If they deliver a home run, expect to hear me cheering. But they have a long way to go to get to industry leading.
flyprdu is offline  
Old 09-07-2022, 08:28 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Also, AS is the ONLY legacy which flies ONLY narrowbodies. That's a unique market niche, so plagiarizing somebody else's CBA is never going to get it exactly right. Standup on your own two feet and take care of your own business.
As it has been discussed many times on this forum, the legacy moniker means nothing.

Alaska is just another airline. "Alaska stands alone" sounds like a little too much secret sauce.
flyprdu is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gooddeal
Major
1245
07-06-2014 05:54 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices