Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Alaska General Discussion >

Alaska General Discussion

Search

Notices

Alaska General Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2023, 06:20 PM
  #1221  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,031
Default

Originally Posted by tengssuuciurta
Crew domicile =/= hub.
Yea, if they're sufficiently concerned with pilot recruiting they could build lots of trips with DHDs to/from SEATAC in hopes of shooting fish in the AS barrel.

But a smart pilot might be leery of signing on for that... the pilot shortage won't last forever.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 06:54 PM
  #1222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yea, if they're sufficiently concerned with pilot recruiting they could build lots of trips with DHDs to/from SEATAC in hopes of shooting fish in the AS barrel.

But a smart pilot might be leery of signing on for that... the pilot shortage won't last forever.
Most ANC trips start or end with a SEA leg.
DenainaPilot is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 07:07 PM
  #1223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Position: Making coffee
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Yea, if they're sufficiently concerned with pilot recruiting they could build lots of trips with DHDs to/from SEATAC in hopes of shooting fish in the AS barrel.

But a smart pilot might be leery of signing on for that... the pilot shortage won't last forever.
For what it’s worth when UA opened the LAS and MCO bases there wasn’t any additional flying associated with it, trips were just built out of there. There’s a decent amount of 73 and Bus flying through SEA already.
tengssuuciurta is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 07:56 PM
  #1224  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,031
Default

I guess my point is if it wasn't justified before, and there's no expansion at the new domicile, why are they doing it now?

If the answer is pilot shortage and recruiting, not growth, then ask yourself what happens after the shortage? That could matter if you're young and don't want to commute (or move) to SFO or DEN at some point.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 08:43 PM
  #1225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2019
Posts: 791
Default

It is also possible that there is a gentle paradigm shift taking place. It is possible that when viewed in totality, the cost benefit of more choices and more satisfaction in the ranks can outrun the cost and make it a lasting proposition. As to gate space, the port of Seattle is charged with benefiting the community as a whole. Helping grow another full service international carrier like UAL back towards their previous stature is viewed as a huge win. The port does not consider code share/alliance or marketing agreements when they look at community benefit. Alaska is viewed as a domestic only product by the port for that reason
9mikemike is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 08:52 PM
  #1226  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,031
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
It is also possible that there is a gentle paradigm shift taking place. It is possible that when viewed in totality, the cost benefit of more choices and more satisfaction in the ranks can outrun the cost and make it a lasting proposition.
That's possible. It would be a pretty significant paradigm shift for airline managers. Maybe there's a new generation, the crooks we grew up with wouldn't be capable of that sort of enlightened behavior.

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
As to gate space, the port of Seattle is charged with benefiting the community as a whole. Helping grow another full service international carrier like UAL back towards their previous stature is viewed as a huge win. The port does not consider code share/alliance or marketing agreements when they look at community benefit. Alaska is viewed as a domestic only product by the port for that reason
In theory. Reality is there's some locals-only prejudice in the system. At my airport, they pretty much ran HMS Host off the premises when they started giving preference for local concessionaires, vice lowest bidder.

The current legal landscape actually allows communities to preference local businesses.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-30-2023, 08:59 PM
  #1227  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,031
Default

Originally Posted by tengssuuciurta
For what it’s worth when UA opened the LAS and MCO bases there wasn’t any additional flying associated with it, trips were just built out of there. There’s a decent amount of 73 and Bus flying through SEA already.
Not saying they won't do it. Just questioning the motive and how long it will last.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-31-2023, 06:07 AM
  #1228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SFO Guppy CA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Originally Posted by av8or
Heard today on a United JS that UAL CEO either did announce or at minimum stated they are considering SEA as a crew base. If that’s true, do I think that’s laying the groundwork for a potential merger? No. Do I think that Delta and UAL both having crew bases in SEA is going to cripple recruiting? Can’t imagine why it wouldn’t
United guy here…. No formal announcement of a SEA base has been announced by the Company nor the Union. What I can tell you is that I’ve been hearing that SEA and PHX are still on the table. LAS hasn’t worked out like they (the Company) had hoped. MCO has worked out very well because they have better flying there. Right now there is a logistical problem because in another 5 years, we’re not going to have the space to park airplanes with our current base structure. So we need so find some space.

Any bases would probably not be like our existing base structure. They wouldn’t be considered a “hub”. They would simply be somewhere we start and end the flying based on how many commuters there are. That is what the Company has actually said. They want to have bases where pilots predominantly want to live.
DashTrash is offline  
Old 10-31-2023, 08:54 AM
  #1229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by DashTrash
United guy here…. No formal announcement of a SEA base has been announced by the Company nor the Union. What I can tell you is that I’ve been hearing that SEA and PHX are still on the table. LAS hasn’t worked out like they (the Company) had hoped. MCO has worked out very well because they have better flying there. Right now there is a logistical problem because in another 5 years, we’re not going to have the space to park airplanes with our current base structure. So we need so find some space.

Any bases would probably not be like our existing base structure. They wouldn’t be considered a “hub”. They would simply be somewhere we start and end the flying based on how many commuters there are. That is what the Company has actually said. They want to have bases where pilots predominantly want to live.
This can’t be true, Av8or has already confirmed the whole thing with our union… wait what🤦‍♂️🤭🤔

Remember Alaska is going out of business, Angry 30 have already decided in their own minds… must be true🙄🙄🙄
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Old 10-31-2023, 09:07 AM
  #1230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by 9mikemike
It is also possible that there is a gentle paradigm shift taking place. It is possible that when viewed in totality, the cost benefit of more choices and more satisfaction in the ranks can outrun the cost and make it a lasting proposition. As to gate space, the port of Seattle is charged with benefiting the community as a whole. Helping grow another full service international carrier like UAL back towards their previous stature is viewed as a huge win. The port does not consider code share/alliance or marketing agreements when they look at community benefit. Alaska is viewed as a domestic only product by the port for that reason
This is probably as dumb of a statement as I have ever read on here. It starts out with the premise that of corse Alaska has the worst management and every other management group is significantly better. Just your usual whining. I don’t think you have ever written anything positive, ever. You just hate all things Alaska, you are a swamp of negativity.
As for your other premise about the Port of Seattle. It’s all 100% BS. It is uneducated gibberish, no the POS can’t just take 10 gates from Alaska because they want too, because international somehow benefits the community more… Allocation for 2024 is done, Alaska makes up 55%, there is no 10 gate hold for UA😂😂😂
United could try and trade gates or buy AS or DA, those are the real options.
UA is a great airline, AS is a great airline, both are going to be just fine. I think 2024 however is going to be a rough year for everyone!
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gooddeal
Major
1245
07-06-2014 05:54 PM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices