Temporary Flight Deck Mask Policy
#111
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
#113
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,817
Yeah, see…that’s how it used to work. The left and their victim-culture crusade has changed the game - it is no longer the intent but rather its reception that matters. That means anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of public opinion, aka “the mob.” No free society can operate like this for long.
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
Yeah, see…that’s how it used to work. The left and their victim-culture crusade has changed the game - it is no longer the intent but rather its reception that matters. That means anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of public opinion, aka “the mob.” No free society can operate like this for long.
Without evidence of actual terminations happening because of a misgendering, your post will only be a rant caused by hysteria and too much internet.
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 209
#116
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,938
Wow someone is really taking it personal.
So here's the thing. I know a pilot who wrote on an issue related to travel benefits (!) in the Pulse comment section, and was accused by a FA of needing sensitivity training because obviously, that FA did not agree with the viewpoint the pilot had written. The following day that pilot received a phone call from the travel department to clarify the issue, but was advised right at the beginning of the phone call that an individual from HR was also on the line.
That was the last time that pilot ever posted on Pulse.
So say what you want, but the reality remains is that things go good when your opinion matches and is generally accepted by the society where you're located. In the context, it's progressive society.
Another case in point. Years ago, Southwest had a pilot do the G-G-G rant. That was despicable, sure, but I don't think he should have been fired. Get an ass chewing, told to never do it again, apologize to your crew, and get out of the CP office now. Since that happened over 10 yrs ago, it was precisely what happened. In the end he kept his job, had to apologize, etc. If a G-G-G rant happened today, you can bet that pilot would be terminated. It would spread like wild fire on social media and the airline would see no choice but to clean up.
Look at the AA pilot that had a #FJB badge on his bag. A hashtag of three letters, and one pax blasted it on twitter, and AA went into full investigation mode. Would that have POed a Trump type person, say, in DFW? Probably not. But in a place like SFO, LAX, JFK? Probably. Now I will say obviously we all know what FJB means and I am not for that type of language no matter what I feel about the POTUS. Personally, I wouldn't wear that badge on my bag. That said, lets call it for what it is: a political statement. The flip side is, some companies (most companies) have made some political statements "ok" to wear. An example would be BLM. Problem is, that too creates a problem because not everyone supports that. Which goes back to the point, as long as it's accepted by a society at large, then it makes it ok.
I honestly want no part in it. I don't ever plan to wear any political pin, any gender identity pin, badge, sticker, etc. I have just the crew tags on my bags that identify my name and phone #.
So here's the thing. I know a pilot who wrote on an issue related to travel benefits (!) in the Pulse comment section, and was accused by a FA of needing sensitivity training because obviously, that FA did not agree with the viewpoint the pilot had written. The following day that pilot received a phone call from the travel department to clarify the issue, but was advised right at the beginning of the phone call that an individual from HR was also on the line.
That was the last time that pilot ever posted on Pulse.
So say what you want, but the reality remains is that things go good when your opinion matches and is generally accepted by the society where you're located. In the context, it's progressive society.
Another case in point. Years ago, Southwest had a pilot do the G-G-G rant. That was despicable, sure, but I don't think he should have been fired. Get an ass chewing, told to never do it again, apologize to your crew, and get out of the CP office now. Since that happened over 10 yrs ago, it was precisely what happened. In the end he kept his job, had to apologize, etc. If a G-G-G rant happened today, you can bet that pilot would be terminated. It would spread like wild fire on social media and the airline would see no choice but to clean up.
Look at the AA pilot that had a #FJB badge on his bag. A hashtag of three letters, and one pax blasted it on twitter, and AA went into full investigation mode. Would that have POed a Trump type person, say, in DFW? Probably not. But in a place like SFO, LAX, JFK? Probably. Now I will say obviously we all know what FJB means and I am not for that type of language no matter what I feel about the POTUS. Personally, I wouldn't wear that badge on my bag. That said, lets call it for what it is: a political statement. The flip side is, some companies (most companies) have made some political statements "ok" to wear. An example would be BLM. Problem is, that too creates a problem because not everyone supports that. Which goes back to the point, as long as it's accepted by a society at large, then it makes it ok.
I honestly want no part in it. I don't ever plan to wear any political pin, any gender identity pin, badge, sticker, etc. I have just the crew tags on my bags that identify my name and phone #.
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
So here's the thing. I know a pilot who wrote on an issue related to travel benefits (!) in the Pulse comment section, and was accused by a FA of needing sensitivity training because obviously, that FA did not agree with the viewpoint the pilot had written. The following day that pilot received a phone call from the travel department to clarify the issue, but was advised right at the beginning of the phone call that an individual from HR was also on the line.
That was the last time that pilot ever posted on Pulse.
So say what you want, but the reality remains is that things go good when your opinion matches and is generally accepted by the society where you're located. In the context, it's progressive society.
That was the last time that pilot ever posted on Pulse.
So say what you want, but the reality remains is that things go good when your opinion matches and is generally accepted by the society where you're located. In the context, it's progressive society.
Another case in point. Years ago, Southwest had a pilot do the G-G-G rant. That was despicable, sure, but I don't think he should have been fired. Get an ass chewing, told to never do it again, apologize to your crew, and get out of the CP office now. Since that happened over 10 yrs ago, it was precisely what happened. In the end he kept his job, had to apologize, etc. If a G-G-G rant happened today, you can bet that pilot would be terminated. It would spread like wild fire on social media and the airline would see no choice but to clean up.
Look at the AA pilot that had a #FJB badge on his bag. A hashtag of three letters, and one pax blasted it on twitter, and AA went into full investigation mode. Would that have POed a Trump type person, say, in DFW? Probably not. But in a place like SFO, LAX, JFK? Probably. Now I will say obviously we all know what FJB means and I am not for that type of language no matter what I feel about the POTUS. Personally, I wouldn't wear that badge on my bag. That said, lets call it for what it is: a political statement. The flip side is, some companies (most companies) have made some political statements "ok" to wear. An example would be BLM. Problem is, that too creates a problem because not everyone supports that. Which goes back to the point, as long as it's accepted by a society at large, then it makes it ok.
Writes a 500 word post about it.
You've gone off the rails and deep into politics. I dare not follow you except to point out your most blatant hypocrisies.
#118
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,938
100% speculation on your part. There you go getting in the minds of others again.
You're equivocating. Not all political statements are equal. "FJB" is vulgar and unprofessional, no matter your position. The Rainbow Flag isn't equal to a Nazi flag. I'm disappointed how low you had to reach for this one.
Writes a 500 word post about it. You've gone off the rails and deep into politics. I dare not follow you except to point out your most blatant hypocrisies.
#119
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,817
Try principled nuanced, and cautious maybe. But I do admire a progressive’s “damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead” approach. Good on you…but if you can’t see how literally anybody could fall victim to changing political winds in this brave new culture - even your venerable self, I’m not interested in discussing further.
#120
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 686
I sincerely hope that atm, if someone unintentionally misgenders someone, and the issue is raised to HR (People Dept?), it'll simply be a quick phone call reminding the "offender" to mind their Ps and Qs.
However, it appears that if it's a case where they are deliberately misgendering another, even because of a sincerely held religious belief, then they are on definitely a slippery slope wrt to termination.
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/what-can-employers-do-about-employees-6007132/
If you have to die on a hill, make sure it's worth it.
However, it appears that if it's a case where they are deliberately misgendering another, even because of a sincerely held religious belief, then they are on definitely a slippery slope wrt to termination.
https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/what-can-employers-do-about-employees-6007132/
If you have to die on a hill, make sure it's worth it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
takingmessages
Flight Schools and Training
8
07-07-2018 11:11 PM