Search

Notices

Life at Alaska !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2021, 12:12 PM
  #111  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,915
Default

Does anyone know since Oct 31 falls on Sunday, is the ESPP going to purchase on today's stock price or on Monday 11/1 stock price? Which date gets locked in?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-29-2021, 06:46 PM
  #112  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2021
Position: Seated
Posts: 1
Default Working Conditions Compared

Interesting comparison of what it's like at AS vs others.

https://youtu.be/fwhjHXCXlAI
SierraDelta is offline  
Old 10-29-2021, 07:16 PM
  #113  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Aug 2014
Posts: 7
Default

Originally Posted by SierraDelta
Interesting comparison of what it's like at AS vs others.

https://youtu.be/fwhjHXCXlAI
Shame to lose good people who wanted to stay here. It's a good video and sad that our work rules and working conditions led to this. Hopefully that will change by the end of this contract cycle.
dereliction is offline  
Old 10-29-2021, 11:50 PM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 359
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Does anyone know since Oct 31 falls on Sunday, is the ESPP going to purchase on today's stock price or on Monday 11/1 stock price? Which date gets locked in?
Although it doesn’t specify which date is used in this scenario, all of the ESPP literature, including the prospectus, indicate the purchase price date and FMV is 10/31. So, it must be the market close price on 10/29. The close price on 11/1 will be used as the offering date FMV for the next period.
cesnacaptn is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:03 AM
  #115  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2021
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by SierraDelta
Interesting comparison of what it's like at AS vs others.

https://youtu.be/fwhjHXCXlAI

So you are never able to drop anything at AS? And what besides scope is way behind standard.
rainyday is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 11:09 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 1,238
Default

Originally Posted by SierraDelta
Interesting comparison of what it's like at AS vs others.

https://youtu.be/fwhjHXCXlAI
I am sorry but if you are going to sell this narrative, make sure it’s sold honestly. I am sure many have left because of scope, pay, and scheduling but not MW. I loved flying with MW but come on. Days into his Alaska career, we are out at dinner and I said “so you moving west?” He said “No, I am just going to commute from ORD”. I said really, “so what is it UAL, AAL, or SWA.” He gave me a giant MW smile and said “United.” I am very happy for him, he drives to work now, but he never intended to stay here. It was never pay, scope, or scheduling… we simply didn’t have a Chicago base. Talk about a false narrative. Put a real honest story out there, don’t sell a lie…. I thought we were the honest ones, I thought we were better then that🤔.
OTZeagle1 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 11:55 AM
  #117  
On Reserve
 
h8ngman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2020
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by rainyday
So you are never able to drop anything at AS? And what besides scope is way behind standard.
No minimum day credit, reserve days off aren’t tied to a calendar day, and the swap flexibility on your schedule is based on staffing goalpost which seem to change with the wind. It isn’t the worst place in the world but there’s LOTS of room for improvement.
h8ngman is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 12:31 PM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Precarious
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I am sorry but if you are going to sell this narrative, make sure it’s sold honestly. I am sure many have left because of scope, pay, and scheduling but not MW. I loved flying with MW but come on. Days into his Alaska career, we are out at dinner and I said “so you moving west?” He said “No, I am just going to commute from ORD”. I said really, “so what is it UAL, AAL, or SWA.” He gave me a giant MW smile and said “United.” I am very happy for him, he drives to work now, but he never intended to stay here. It was never pay, scope, or scheduling… we simply didn’t have a Chicago base. Talk about a false narrative. Put a real honest story out there, don’t sell a lie…. I thought we were the honest ones, I thought we were better then that🤔.
Out of my new hire class of 6 only 3 of us are still here. They all found greener pastures, and commute was only a factor for one of them.
conquestdz is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 12:41 PM
  #119  
missionary
 
GearBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Right seat 787 or missionary
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Arctichicken
Sadly, there are very few pros here at eskimo’s world, especially given the current pilots vs. company climate. Having sat reserve for years in both seats, your blood pressure will definitely rise to unhealthy levels. Get ready to embrace the suck and contentious environment created by management.
As for me, I should have left for greener pastures after Kasher. My advice: run away, if you can.
Originally Posted by Arctichicken
Sadly, there are very few pros here at eskimo’s world, especially given the current pilots vs. company climate. Having sat reserve for years in both seats, your blood pressure will definitely rise to unhealthy levels. Get ready to embrace the suck and contentious environment created by management.
As for me, I should have left for greener pastures after Kasher. My advice: run away, if you can.
I left after Kasher and I am glad that I did. I turned in my resignation to Barry R., the then LAX BCP. The almost 35% pay cut was bad but there were so many more things that were horrible, life-ruining

I still stay in touch with my ALASKA buddies. One of them sent me a link to the video. Sadly like Arctichicken, a lot of them express that if they had to do it all over again they would’ve left or should’ve never gone to Alaska in the first place. These guys are all captains now.

When I first got there, all of the old-timers told me jokes that didn’t make sense to me, at the time. They used to tell me that the wheel at Alaska still had four sides and that the Company ran the airline with a number two pencil, that it was all image and no substance, the biggest regional on the west coast. A family? Yes, a dysfunctional family that eats it’s young- It all turned-out to be true. We used to say, “At Alaska, we are number one, “ and held up six fingers.

Management was anti-pilot. B.J,, R.S., J.W., C.M, and the likes were all in Pilot Resource Management. I was not an asset to be maximized but a liability to be minimized. There was a history of firing pilot advocates. The list of chief pilots and vice presidents of flight ops who had gone to bat for pilots only to be fired by the Company for doing so was long and distinguished.

Post-Benito, everything was metrics. The only thing the company understood was costs, especially due to canceled flights.. Now that your egomaniacal rumored philanderer Mini Douchebag is in charge, you get the same metrics with an even more adversarial anti-labor perspective.

I do not think you guys and gals are going to get a better contract until those metrics are adversely effected. People need to start leaving in droves like they did years ago when you got rid of b scale. Alaska needs to no longer be able to attract and retain “qualified pilots.” Flights need to cancel.

When I was there, the closest the Alaska pilots ever came to growing a pair of cojones was one ping. Maybe the guys who remember can bring it back, stop enabling a broken operation.

In my opinion, the Union was too weak and conciliatory to management. Too many of the Union officers and volunteers wanted to be across the street or on the second floor. The Union never wanted to appear unreasonable in the eyes an arbitrator or a mediator. So, the Union always seemed to ask for what they thought was reasonable only to settle for less than reasonable. On top of that, too many pilots were doing VSA during negotiations. Even then and former Union volunteers were rumored to have been doing it.. The word on the street was that it was OK to do VSA until the Union put out a “This is What the Company Thinks of You” update. The pilots were supposed the read between the lines, IMO.

In their Union Road Shows, the Union swayed and convinced pilots to vote yes on inferior TA’s. They used their time value of money arguments, saying that they believed the pilots deserved better but that it would take too much time to get it. So, they recommended that you take the money rather than hold out for a better deal. A big problem with accepting a weak TA was that it became the starting point for your next contract and you’re then became even more behind. After years of settling, you guys and gals now find yourself years behind, so far behind that nothing short of a strike will get you there, so it seems.

From what I have read, not much has changed. Again, in retrospect leaving was the best thing I did. I only wish that I would not have gone there in the first place. I wasted career time at Alaska, and more importantly time away from my wife and children, needlessly.

I wish that there would have been an Arctichicken telling me to run.

run away, run far away.

Take heed

Last edited by GearBoy; 10-30-2021 at 01:04 PM.
GearBoy is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 12:46 PM
  #120  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by OTZeagle1
I am sorry but if you are going to sell this narrative, make sure it’s sold honestly. I am sure many have left because of scope, pay, and scheduling but not MW. I loved flying with MW but come on. Days into his Alaska career, we are out at dinner and I said “so you moving west?” He said “No, I am just going to commute from ORD”. I said really, “so what is it UAL, AAL, or SWA.” He gave me a giant MW smile and said “United.” I am very happy for him, he drives to work now, but he never intended to stay here. It was never pay, scope, or scheduling… we simply didn’t have a Chicago base. Talk about a false narrative. Put a real honest story out there, don’t sell a lie…. I thought we were the honest ones, I thought we were better then that.

False narrative… ummm, no. I know him personally, as well as several others who took the “leap of faith”. It was a tough choice because most of us love the idea of “doing the RIGHT thing” that the company is selling, although we find again and again that it’s currently not reality. Alaska is a well run company, with great people, but management has been contractually abusing this pilot group for almost a decade. As long as management’s “business” mentality remains the same, our contract will remain unattractive, and uncompetitive with other major airlines’, and most LCC contracts.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
fucius is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
TheFly
Regional
16
06-16-2015 10:48 AM
flybywire44
American
2
01-27-2014 02:27 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
1
05-03-2011 05:44 PM
Freight Dog
Major
1
05-02-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices