Search

Notices

Yikes...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2018, 09:44 AM
  #321  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 2,756
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Professional drunks learn to be pretty stealthy, ie hide their condition, not file very public lawsuits. Wherever on the spectrum she falls between light social drinker and addict, she should knowhow to handle herself by now. It's teenage coeds who are prone to have buyers remorse and scream rape so they can blame someone other than themselves (not excusing frat boys who systematically enable that scenario).

Sure vets are almost certainly more prone to substance issues than others. But the lawsuit makes no sense in that context.
I agree. Nobody in this position is going to invite public scrutiny unless they feel they are squeaky clean. Certainly someone who was an alcoholic would not want to be looked at closely.
busdriver12 is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:03 AM
  #322  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I'm not saying the captain didn't rape her, I'm saying, I don't believe he drugged her, because the symptoms she is describing are atypical of two glasses of wine + whatever drug is common in date rape. If he shot her up with Heroine, then obviously that would be very believable given what she is describing. In college, many of my friends would take Valium with drinks to sleep hard before an exam, then pop adderall in the morning.
I am not saying he drugged her. I have no idea. But to say it’s imposible to black out or have memory loss from a few drinks and a drug like GHB or Flunitrazepam is false. These drugs effects are dose dependent and at large enough doses by themselves can cause unconsciousness and anterograde amnesia (the ability to form memories). The dose and mixture it takes to reach these side effects depends on the individual.

http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/q...BPreReview.pdf
Slayer1234 is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:19 AM
  #323  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver12
I agree. Nobody in this position is going to invite public scrutiny unless they feel they are squeaky clean. Certainly someone who was an alcoholic would not want to be looked at closely.
You're assuming people make rational decisions. Lisa Nowak was both a Navy pilot and a NASA astronaut. She drove across the country in a diaper with a kidnap kit in her vehicle. Military ain't special, they're just people. Rational people consider the scrutiny that will follow when they make big public moves. I don't know if the FO is rational or not. One would like to think airlines hire rational FOs, we'd also like to think they don't hire men who become rapist captains. I think everybody can agree on those two statements, yet one of them is false in this particular case.
Han Solo is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:36 AM
  #324  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Packrat
Because it was an issue between two employees and they thought they could keep it out of the press. As long as its "in house" HR was convinced they could cover it up.

Different story when outside folks are involved. I know a guy who was fired from AS because he made off-color remarks to a female taxi driver and she complained to the Company.

The reason Ms. Pina is torqued is that AS tried to sweep it under the rug and allowed the Capt. to keep working for 8 months. Now that the story is public, he got suspended. If, in fact, he does get fired it will be because of the publicity. AS is VERY protective of their image. Often more protective of their image than their employees.
Every instance that I have seen where a company has solid proof that an individual commits any act of sexual assault they are gone. Period. The liabilities are just too great. The attorneys and HR will not take the risk of a lawsuit. Companies will not open themselves up to lawsuits just to cover for somebody. You might get a couple of warnings and suspension with harassment depending on the circumstances, but rape and drugging another employee? You are history.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:42 AM
  #325  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 63
Default

Just thinking. If they were both pulled from duty for drinking and making another crew member go as far as contacting the company stating why they were uncomfortable, wouldn't a drug and alcohol test be conducted after the deadheading back to base? Wouldn't that prove what drugs if any is found in her system under 24 hours.

If a passenger had accused the crew of drinking to the point where they are taken from the trip and sent back to base, I would hope a drug and alcohol test is done instead of a carpet dance to prove for or against the accusation. With that said, I would hope their Chief Pilot Office would have enough common sense to do the same if you are being reported by another crew member because these types of things just don't happen every day

Quest Diagnostic or whoever conduct this required DOT drug and alcohol test should have proof if any or what drugs were in her system if she was drugged.
EasyVictor is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 10:46 AM
  #326  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,013
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
Every instance that I have seen where a company has solid proof that an individual commits any act of sexual assault they are gone. Period. The liabilities are just too great. The attorneys and HR will not take the risk of a lawsuit. Companies will not open themselves up to lawsuits just to cover for somebody.
One would think. I would think a company would PREFER to fire someone so accused if there's any way they can pull it off. If such a person was guilty, odds are they'd do it again eventually and then the company is really left holding the bag, with previous history on record. My guess is he'd be long gone if he was white collar. Union is going to demand some threshold of evidence other than "she said" though.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:10 AM
  #327  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,096
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
I'm not saying the captain didn't rape her, I'm saying, I don't believe he drugged her, because the symptoms she is describing are atypical of two glasses of wine + whatever drug is common in date rape.
YMMV. I've had 0.5 mg of Xanax once, as a premed an hour before a dental implant. According to my wife, I was talking to the Care Bears forty-five minutes later, enroute to the dental surgeon. I don't remember it, or the surgery which was done under IV sedation. Or for about an hour afterwards. And that was with no alcohol whatever aboard.

The IV and surgery could have been done by the building janitor for all I can recall.

If so, he did a good job though....
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:16 AM
  #328  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
There is no physical evidence in this case. That's the entire point. She is suing Alaska based of a set of he said, she said. There are no criminal charges against the captain. Is her story plausible, hell no. Did she get drunk, and the captain take advantage of her, probably, but drugging her takes it to a whole new level, and there is no evidence at all of that. The only thing to go on is well known drug effects described in medical reference manuals, which I did.



What about her age relates anything to drinking tolerance.
Oh I guarantee you there will be physical evidence and witnesses. You'd be amazed at how much scrutiny of crews there are on layovers at hotels these days. For liability reasons these hotels are wired and cammed out the wazoo. Plus hotel employees know who the crews are and keep an eye on what is going on. I guarantee there were hotel employees present in the Concierge room that witnessed what happened and how much she drank. Apparently the FAs were in the room as well. The other thing I guarantee is as soon as the "First Officer" was called, the company called hotel management and had them take pictures and go through everything in their rooms once they checked out.

Further in order to believe in a coverup, you would have to buy the fact that the outside attorney they hired to investigate is complicit. Somehow I don't buy the idea that Marcella Reed, an African American female attorney, with a 25 year career as a employment lawyer with emphasis in diversity issues, harassment issues, workplace violence, and developed the diversity program for Boeing would find evidence of drugging and rape, and then cover it up. It just doesn't wash. If this lady found credible evidence of sexual assault this guy would be gone. She's not going to risk her reputation for this guy or Alaska Airlines.

Hopefully her report will be made public either in discovery or Alaska may have to release it somehow given the public nature of these accusations.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:17 AM
  #329  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 12,096
Default

Originally Posted by EasyVictor
Just thinking. If they were both pulled from duty for drinking and making another crew member go as far as contacting the company stating why they were uncomfortable, wouldn't a drug and alcohol test be conducted after the deadheading back to base? Wouldn't that prove what drugs if any is found in her system under 24 hours.

If a passenger had accused the crew of drinking to the point where they are taken from the trip and sent back to base, I would hope a drug and alcohol test is done instead of a carpet dance to prove for or against the accusation. With that said, I would hope their Chief Pilot Office would have enough common sense to do the same if you are being reported by another crew member because these types of things just don't happen every day

Quest Diagnostic or whoever conduct this required DOT drug and alcohol test should have proof if any or what drugs were in her system if she was drugged.

Nope. They test for five categories of drugs only. None of the drugs most commonly used for date rape are included:

As per DOT regulations 49 CFR Part 40 the DOT panel now looks like this:

Marijuana metabolites
Cocaine metabolites
Phencyclidine (PCP)
Opioids (codeine, heroin, morphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, hydrocodonea and hydromorphone)
Amphetamines (amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA & MDA)
Excargodog is offline  
Old 03-19-2018, 11:20 AM
  #330  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Slayer1234
I am not saying he drugged her. I have no idea. But to say it’s imposible to black out or have memory loss from a few drinks and a drug like GHB or Flunitrazepam is false. These drugs effects are dose dependent and at large enough doses by themselves can cause unconsciousness and anterograde amnesia (the ability to form memories). The dose and mixture it takes to reach these side effects depends on the individual.

http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/q...BPreReview.pdf
I'm not focusing on the blacking out/memory loss, these drugs interfere with GABA receptors in the brain. It's the unconscious vomiting, ability to make it back to her room, after a call with ALPA at 2:46 am, and her next morning of being extremely hungover with immediate vomiting upon ingestion of any fluids, are not know side effects of Benzos. You still have to drink heavily to have the results she is describing. However, if her drinking was heavy enough, then all of her symptoms can be attributed to the alcohol. It's significantly more likely they both over drank, the captain took advantage of her in her drunken state, rather than the captain is carrying around date rape drugs.
Mesabah is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mailman
FedEx
63
09-08-2015 04:18 PM
PearlPilot
Safety
8
06-11-2013 07:35 AM
detpilot
Hangar Talk
0
02-28-2008 09:12 PM
MaydayMark
Cargo
7
08-30-2007 06:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices