Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Alaska
Spirit TA and Alaska Contract >

Spirit TA and Alaska Contract

Search

Notices

Spirit TA and Alaska Contract

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2018, 12:59 PM
  #11  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by ForeverJunior
An important thing to remember about scope, especially when it comes to the Alaska pilots is that it shouldn't focus solely on regional type flying. What is to stop AAG from getting some outfit to fly 787's with the Eskimo painted on the tail?
I agree, but historically the biggest threat for outsourcing has been smaller aircraft. How many 787s is Air Group currently contracting? How many E175s and Dash-8s are they contracting? Frequency is king with regards to marketing, and that's what small airplanes give them. When Skywest first ordered E175s, we were told that they wouldn't operate any of them for Alaska. That's the biggest threat.

At this point, their international codeshare network is robust enough that the odds of them spending money to acquire large airplanes is almost nil.

We need protection for both, but I would go after the small airplanes first, then the large end of the spectrum.

Originally Posted by ForeverJunior
Anything having more than ZERO seats and above a certain gross weight (ALSO ZERO) should be flown by pilots on the Alaska Airlines seniority list.
Fixed. Scope isn't strong enough until anything with an Eskimo on the tail has an Alaska Airlines flight crew in it.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 03:52 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,927
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
I wouldn't know what 5 year pay for FO is since most of us are on the CA pay after 2.5-3 years.
Pilots still fall for this? Spirit tripled in size in the past 6 years. Based on its current size and order book, it's highly unlikely to be a trend going forward. Hopefully everyone looks at payrates in all longevity and both seats.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 05:17 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Pilots still fall for this? Spirit tripled in size in the past 6 years. Based on its current size and order book, it's highly unlikely to be a trend going forward. Hopefully everyone looks at payrates in all longevity and both seats.
Try reading my post again. I said “Most of us” myself included, was able to upgrade after 2.5 - 3 years. You bring up trend, which is not what I was talking about. Most of the Spirit pilots don’t deal with 5 year FO pay (which is my point). We don’t look at that unless we choose to wait that long to upgrade. Doesn't most of us look at a TA and see how it affect us? I’m more concern with our 5 year CA pay than our 5 year FO pay. Just like some guys are more concern with certain items than others.
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 05:30 PM
  #14  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,637
Default

That’s the same attitude that got us into this mess.
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 08:42 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
I agree, but historically the biggest threat for outsourcing has been smaller aircraft. How many 787s is Air Group currently contracting? How many E175s and Dash-8s are they contracting? Frequency is king with regards to marketing, and that's what small airplanes give them. When Skywest first ordered E175s, we were told that they wouldn't operate any of them for Alaska. That's the biggest threat.

At this point, their international codeshare network is robust enough that the odds of them spending money to acquire large airplanes is almost nil.

We need protection for both, but I would go after the small airplanes first, then the large end of the spectrum.


Fixed. Scope isn't strong enough until anything with an Eskimo on the tail has an Alaska Airlines flight crew in it.
Highlighted a couple statements that should be compared together for you...
Baradium is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 08:57 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
Default

Originally Posted by Silver02ex
Try reading my post again. I said “Most of us” myself included, was able to upgrade after 2.5 - 3 years. You bring up trend, which is not what I was talking about. Most of the Spirit pilots don’t deal with 5 year FO pay (which is my point). We don’t look at that unless we choose to wait that long to upgrade. Doesn't most of us look at a TA and see how it affect us? I’m more concern with our 5 year CA pay than our 5 year FO pay. Just like some guys are more concern with certain items than others.
The saddest of attitudes. Myopia is prevalent with too many of the Spirit guys and pilots in general, but the Spirit guys are voting on a TA with this mentality, watch out.
dogpilot is offline  
Old 02-14-2018, 11:58 PM
  #17  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium
Highlighted a couple statements that should be compared together for you...
I know.

But good luck stuffing the code share nonsense back into the bag if you can't even limit regional airframes.

One battle at a time.
pete2800 is offline  
Old 02-15-2018, 07:17 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 2,370
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
I know.

But good luck stuffing the code share nonsense back into the bag if you can't even limit regional airframes.

One battle at a time.
I've been under the impression that there was no desire to limit regional airframes from the AS pilot group, at least not until recently.

Outside looking in, but scope came up a few times while jumpseating and I was told each time that it wasn't important enough to negotiate for. Is there actually a strong calling as a group to get some scope in the next contract now?
Baradium is offline  
Old 02-15-2018, 02:49 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 128
Default

During the last negotiations most of the pilots at Alaska weren’t concerned because they had dash-8’s and CRJ-200’s in their heads. Now that they look over and see the E-175’s are nicer and almost as large as their 737’s they see a threat. Only now it’s too late.

Oh well.
AltoCumulus is offline  
Old 02-15-2018, 03:56 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gators's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 355
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Pilots still fall for this? Spirit tripled in size in the past 6 years. Based on its current size and order book, it's highly unlikely to be a trend going forward. Hopefully everyone looks at payrates in all longevity and both seats.


I agree that all years in the pay scale are important but the quick upgrade is likely to continue. Spirit is making a lot of money and I doubt anyone will be surprised when a new order is announced. It’s been openly talked about on quarterly financial discussions
Gators is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices