Search

Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2017, 05:41 AM
  #5371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by el jefe
The company probably surprised AA with the UA announcement and still needs to come up with a draw down plan for our AA flying. DCA will probably be the first to go this summer.

We will probably see the closure of PHL/DCA/ORF as crew bases once the transition starts, ORF will be a RON MX base only as well as MKE and CAE. The UA flying out of our AA bases is not enough to support crew bases, people who live in PHL/ORF should expect to learn how to commute. If you're butthurt about suddenly having to commute, ask the DEN/ORD guys what it was like back in 2006.
Really, you think AA didn't know ? AWAC's AA lift has been slowly replaced even before the announcement . The clues started when PDT moved into PHL with the Jets and eagle moved back to LGA, oh and PSA into D.C. AA knew and so did AWAC for over a year. Just because it was a surprise to us peasants doesn't mean they didn't have a plan.
Einstein2014 is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 06:26 AM
  #5372  
Tier 3 Candidate
 
el jefe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Canadair Gosh
Posts: 609
Default

The only people that knew UA was talking to ZW, were UA and ZW. So yea, it probably came as a surprise to AA that we are moving our whole fleet over to UA within a year. Flying for UA could come earlier than 02/2018, and I don't think AA was prepared for that.

AA could have been waiting for ZW to bid even cheaper flying to stay afloat after 02/2018. Yes, I'm no dummy that we have been slowly replaced by the WO's at our domiciles. But, I'm also sure that AA still wanted some lift out of us, albeit at a much lower rate than we were at, even with the extension we were on.


My post was more about the wild speculation of what our rad new domiciles will be... ASE! DEN! EWR! LAX! SFO! whatever!

As far as we have been told, its gonna be ORD and IAD so start making plans if you live near PHL, ORF or north of DCA.
Commute to live, live to commute.
el jefe is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 07:09 AM
  #5373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 123
Default

Originally Posted by el jefe
The only people that knew UA was talking to ZW, were UA and ZW. So yea, it probably came as a surprise to AA that we are moving our whole fleet over to UA within a year. Flying for UA could come earlier than 02/2018, and I don't think AA was prepared for that.

AA could have been waiting for ZW to bid even cheaper flying to stay afloat after 02/2018. Yes, I'm no dummy that we have been slowly replaced by the WO's at our domiciles. But, I'm also sure that AA still wanted some lift out of us, albeit at a much lower rate than we were at, even with the extension we were on.


My post was more about the wild speculation of what our rad new domiciles will be... ASE! DEN! EWR! LAX! SFO! whatever!

As far as we have been told, its gonna be ORD and IAD so start making plans if you live near PHL, ORF or north of DCA.
Commute to live, live to commute.
My point was that AA and AWAC knew they weren't going to reach an agreement long ago hence the reason for the lack of communication from management at AWAC to its people. It wasn't a surprise to AA and AA has been working to fill our slots since they couldn't reach an agreement. I am sure ORD won't be a base . UA got rid of 700 flying out of there and increased 900 and E170. DEN for the crj200 don't think so, i would say IAD to start . Don't know what market UA is planning on reaching with AWAC's 200 but doubt it will be on the west coast.
Einstein2014 is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 07:11 AM
  #5374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by el jefe
The only people that knew UA was talking to ZW, were UA and ZW. So yea, it probably came as a surprise to AA that we are moving our whole fleet over to UA within a year. Flying for UA could come earlier than 02/2018, and I don't think AA was prepared for that.

AA could have been waiting for ZW to bid even cheaper flying to stay afloat after 02/2018.
Or, AA could have been the first one to leave the table and had a plan all along. Either way, they are prepared to carry on without ZW. They have bases everywhere we do besides ORF. I bet AA really wanted that hangar!
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 11:31 AM
  #5375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 227
Default

Well, whether they (AA) knew or not, it's worth noting that the bulk of the planes I saw in the world today were Trans States and not PSA. So maybe things aren't going quite as planned for ol AAG. (one can hope anyway)
lalo is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 11:37 AM
  #5376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 755
Default

Originally Posted by lalo
Well, whether they (AA) knew or not, it's worth noting that the bulk of the planes I saw in the world today were Trans States and not PSA. So maybe things aren't going quite as planned for ol AAG. (one can hope anyway)
PSA's DCA base is a 700 base, not a 200. TransStates is doing the 50 seat flying out of DCA.
PSA help is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 12:43 PM
  #5377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by PSA help
PSA's DCA base is a 700 base, not a 200. TransStates is doing the 50 seat flying out of DCA.
Ah..... Roger. Well my desire to see AA fail has been foiled again!
lalo is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 04:32 PM
  #5378  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,222
Default

Kirby or Parker said a year ago that AWAC had executed their extension but after that would be replaced in a Crews News. An FA asked about up gauging the ORF-DCA flights and they said when AWAC was gone it would still be a 50 seater.

Just remember how AWAC ended up with US Airways. United canceled their contract and forced them out in a very expedited manner. That is why there are so many guys hired in the 2004-2006 time period and not many from before. They all got tired of commuting and went elsewhere. The PHL crewroom (hanger) was horrible those first couple months, no crashpads and people were sleeping everywhere.
Name User is offline  
Old 03-12-2017, 04:49 PM
  #5379  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,607
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
They all got tired of commuting and went elsewhere. The PHL crewroom (hanger) was horrible those first couple months, no crashpads and people were sleeping everywhere.
Sleeping bag on a shared crewroom couch above Jet Rock FTW!
BoilerUP is online now  
Old 03-14-2017, 04:31 AM
  #5380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: If I tell you, I'd have to kill you
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Sleeping bag on a shared crewroom couch above Jet Rock FTW!


You forgot Captain America (now Captain Central America) sleeping in his underwear


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
IFLYACRJ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 04:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices