Search

Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2017, 03:57 PM
  #4851  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by What
I would suggest that someone from AWAC finds out if it was that UAL management recognized AWAC as a distressed carrier or if the UAL MEC passed a resolution in order to ask management to invoke that clause of the UAL CBA. Maybe someone jumped the gun and passed onto the pilot group that United recognized AWAC as a distressed carrier when all of what had happened was a resolution passed at the MEC level...
A former awac pilot/current ual pilot confirmed this with the head of hr at ual.
Day4mx is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:05 PM
  #4852  
Gets Weekends Off
 
billyho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Default

Sounds like the US Airways deal with the WO's during the Pref. Interviewing times. Checking the box gave you tons of points to get you and interview. We even had FO's with no PIC time getting hired at US Airways.
Sounds like a good deal and EVERYONE at AWAC!! Even FO's should take advantage of this if United is offering this.
Good Luck!
billyho is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:05 PM
  #4853  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

My guess is some things are in the works. That's why no one is talking, for fear of being wrong when UAL reveals the verdict. But I've got to say, ARW's explanation of UAL's distressed carrier clause didn't make a whole lot of sense. There haven't been any layoffs or shutdowns here. What loose definition of distress are they talking about??

"Subject to other legal obligations, the Company shall make reasonable efforts to fill Pilot vacancies with the individuals who satisfy United’s hiring standards, who have previously worked for carriers represented by ALPA, and who are no longer working for those carriers for economic reasons such as lay-offs or the shutdown of that carrier. "

If your application says that you are were laid off by Air Wisconsin and unemployed, and the interviewer asks you where you work...what the heck do you say?

Last edited by sweetholyjesus; 01-30-2017 at 04:32 PM.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:14 PM
  #4854  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Day4mx
A former awac pilot/current ual pilot confirmed this with the head of hr at ual.
We shouldn't be relying on social media posts... The only people we haven't heard from about this are the only people that count: UAL MEC and UAL management. Until they speak up, nothing is set in stone.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 06:21 PM
  #4855  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by sweetholyjesus
We shouldn't be relying on social media posts... The only people we haven't heard from about this are the only people that count: UAL MEC and UAL management. Until they speak up, nothing is set in stone.
This.

You can wait a week for it to be confirmed with an email from the MEC. That'll give you peace of mind if asked by recruiters from UAL.

I'm sure not everyone is on the same page at United Hiring.
Grumbletrousers is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 07:28 PM
  #4856  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotdude3407's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by What
Maybe someone jumped the gun and passed onto the pilot group that United recognized AWAC as a distressed carrier when all of what had happened was a resolution passed at the MEC level...

You do realize that ARW has a long and great relationship with the UAL MEC? This was not some lower level ALPA buddy buddy rumor mill that made its way into a comm. This was approved at several levels. Nobody "jumped the gun" and nobody misunderstood what was happening. It takes an incredible effort to put out a comm within the association. It has to go through officers, comm specs, and attorneys. When ALPA (whether national or MEC level) puts something out, you can bet it wasn't done on a whim.
Pilotdude3407 is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 07:43 PM
  #4857  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pilotdude3407's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by sweetholyjesus
My guess is some things are in the works. That's why no one is talking, for fear of being wrong when UAL reveals the verdict. But I've got to say, ARW's explanation of UAL's distressed carrier clause didn't make a whole lot of sense. There haven't been any layoffs or shutdowns here. What loose definition of distress are they talking about??

"Subject to other legal obligations, the Company shall make reasonable efforts to fill Pilot vacancies with the individuals who satisfy United’s hiring standards, who have previously worked for carriers represented by ALPA, and who are no longer working for those carriers for economic reasons such as lay-offs or the shutdown of that carrier. "

If your application says that you are were laid off by Air Wisconsin and unemployed, and the interviewer asks you where you work...what the heck do you say?


You are way overthinking this. 21.R is a contract provision. It can be interpreted. UAL and UAL MEC have decided to interpret it to encompass those carriers that will more than likely end up in the situation directly spoken to by this language. It is their right to do so, as it is the contract between their pilots and their management. Their MEC has worked out an agreement with their management to allow us to use this provision. The wording on airline apps or in the contract is irrelevant as far as we are concerned. UAL MEC gave us permission to check the box...period. Nobody in their MEC made this up. Their reputations and credibility with their company would be at stake too. It would hurt them far more than us.

United is not going to pull your app, score additional points on it because you selected the box, send out an interview request just to bring you in and ask why you selected the box. They know we aren't out of business. Believe me, they know exactly who is allowed to check that box. There are only a small number of ALPA carriers that have truly gone out of business and would qualify for that. If they see all 575 AWAC pilots select the box and they don't know why, believe me, they will find out and fix it. They aren't going to "blacklist" you for it. Again, your MEC told you to check the box. Either check the box or don't.
Pilotdude3407 is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 07:50 PM
  #4858  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotdude3407
You are way overthinking this. 21.R is a contract provision. It can be interpreted. UAL and UAL MEC have decided to interpret it to encompass those carriers that will more than likely end up in the situation directly spoken to by this language. It is their right to do so, as it is the contract between their pilots and their management. Their MEC has worked out an agreement with their management to allow us to use this provision. The wording on airline apps or in the contract is irrelevant as far as we are concerned. UAL MEC gave us permission to check the box...period. Nobody in their MEC made this up. Their reputations and credibility with their company would be at stake too. It would hurt them far more than us.

United is not going to pull your app, score additional points on it because you selected the box, send out an interview request just to bring you in and ask why you selected the box. They know we aren't out of business. Believe me, they know exactly who is allowed to check that box. There are only a small number of ALPA carriers that have truly gone out of business and would qualify for that. If they see all 575 AWAC pilots select the box and they don't know why, believe me, they will find out and fix it. They aren't going to "blacklist" you for it. Again, your MEC told you to check the box. Either check the box or don't.
Were at 514 as of today
Grumbletrousers is offline  
Old 01-31-2017, 01:31 AM
  #4859  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotdude3407
You are way overthinking this. 21.R is a contract provision. It can be interpreted. UAL and UAL MEC have decided to interpret it to encompass those carriers that will more than likely end up in the situation directly spoken to by this language. It is their right to do so, as it is the contract between their pilots and their management. Their MEC has worked out an agreement with their management to allow us to use this provision. The wording on airline apps or in the contract is irrelevant as far as we are concerned. UAL MEC gave us permission to check the box...period. Nobody in their MEC made this up. Their reputations and credibility with their company would be at stake too. It would hurt them far more than us.

United is not going to pull your app, score additional points on it because you selected the box, send out an interview request just to bring you in and ask why you selected the box. They know we aren't out of business. Believe me, they know exactly who is allowed to check that box. There are only a small number of ALPA carriers that have truly gone out of business and would qualify for that. If they see all 575 AWAC pilots select the box and they don't know why, believe me, they will find out and fix it. They aren't going to "blacklist" you for it. Again, your MEC told you to check the box. Either check the box or don't.
You say this with so much certainty, yet you haven't heard a single peep from UAL hiring, UAL MEC, or any UAL management. All you've heard are two completely opposite stories from our own bickering MEC and management. You'd think if United were really on board, they would make a simple amendment to their online application so Awac pilots wouldn't have to make such a silly looking addition to their apps. I still can't believe ARW is telling people to say that they were laid off on their apps..

And now so many people are willing to put a completely untrue statement on their app because of a FB post.

Very strange times indeed.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 01-31-2017, 10:27 AM
  #4860  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: NYC FO
Posts: 79
Default

Can anybody recommend a good AME in the ORF area?
CabbiInbound is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM
Sir James
Hangar Talk
0
08-04-2005 04:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices