Reopen economy
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
For all the shelter in place folks out there, I'm really curious:
When do you think it will be acceptable to leave?
If there's no cure for another 12-18 months, that means shelter in place until then. Otherwise it's all for nought, because people are going to catch the virus and die.
Is that what you are prepared to do? Is that what we as a society are prepared to do? Can we make it that long? Won't "essential activities" just wind up spreading it anyway?
I'm honestly curious what you think.
When do you think it will be acceptable to leave?
If there's no cure for another 12-18 months, that means shelter in place until then. Otherwise it's all for nought, because people are going to catch the virus and die.
Is that what you are prepared to do? Is that what we as a society are prepared to do? Can we make it that long? Won't "essential activities" just wind up spreading it anyway?
I'm honestly curious what you think.
If you overwhelm the health system, it will be bad for the economy ultimately because it will shatter consumer confidence, and that is not good. A controlled, measured return toward some more commerce is probably the way to go. Coupled with made testing, tracing and intense research.
The economy is not bad because we are slowing it down, it is bad because there is a pandemic on our hands. It is not a choice between health and economy, it is a choice between no economy and bad health, and no economy and good health. Which do you think will give us a shot at a bounce back? My admittedly peanut gallery view is the latter is better.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 171
First off, I think the most honest answer is I don't know and I'd defer to those who are experts in the field. Most of them seem to think that there is a range of options but even economists will tell you that nothing will get better unless the illness is controlled because it is all about consumer confidence.
If you overwhelm the health system, it will be bad for the economy ultimately because it will shatter consumer confidence, and that is not good. A controlled, measured return toward some more commerce is probably the way to go. Coupled with made testing, tracing and intense research.
The economy is not bad because we are slowing it down, it is bad because there is a pandemic on our hands. It is not a choice between health and economy, it is a choice between no economy and bad health, and no economy and good health. Which do you think will give us a shot at a bounce back? My admittedly peanut gallery view is the latter is better.
If you overwhelm the health system, it will be bad for the economy ultimately because it will shatter consumer confidence, and that is not good. A controlled, measured return toward some more commerce is probably the way to go. Coupled with made testing, tracing and intense research.
The economy is not bad because we are slowing it down, it is bad because there is a pandemic on our hands. It is not a choice between health and economy, it is a choice between no economy and bad health, and no economy and good health. Which do you think will give us a shot at a bounce back? My admittedly peanut gallery view is the latter is better.
#45
Do people not understand what’s going on? Good testing is in place. Fatality rate is still almost 4 percent. This ain’t no joke. If it gets loosened up now it’s gonna get exponentially worse. Do yourself and everyone else a favor. Sit tight. Social distance. Wash your hands. Don’t touch your face. Stay home.
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: 787
Posts: 469
I did not realize there were so many MD's moonlighting as professional pilots. It's not just the regional threads though...many posts in the major threads will have you hoping that their critical thinking is better on the flight deck than what is projected here.
#47
Three conditions:
1 - rapid and frequent testing and quarantine of any infected individual.
2 - a treatment that works early and quickly on an outpatient basis.
3 - widespread vaccine. as in small pox or polio.
1 - rapid and frequent testing and quarantine of any infected individual.
2 - a treatment that works early and quickly on an outpatient basis.
3 - widespread vaccine. as in small pox or polio.
For all the shelter in place folks out there, I'm really curious:
When do you think it will be acceptable to leave?
If there's no cure for another 12-18 months, that means shelter in place until then. Otherwise it's all for nought, because people are going to catch the virus and die.
Is that what you are prepared to do? Is that what we as a society are prepared to do? Can we make it that long? Won't "essential activities" just wind up spreading it anyway?
I'm honestly curious what you think.
When do you think it will be acceptable to leave?
If there's no cure for another 12-18 months, that means shelter in place until then. Otherwise it's all for nought, because people are going to catch the virus and die.
Is that what you are prepared to do? Is that what we as a society are prepared to do? Can we make it that long? Won't "essential activities" just wind up spreading it anyway?
I'm honestly curious what you think.
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Posts: 291
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 407
I find it hilarious that any time the media or the FAA puts out a hint of criticism about a pilot we all yell unfair and how they’re not pilots and they can’t understand, but when leading experts in the medical field are giving recommendations all of a sudden pilots become world leading epidemiologists.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2018
Posts: 171
I was talking about all the people disagreeing with the doctors and scientists, not you.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post