Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Air Wisconsin
Air Wisconsin Signs 5 Year CPA With United >

Air Wisconsin Signs 5 Year CPA With United

Search

Notices
Air Wisconsin Regional Airline

Air Wisconsin Signs 5 Year CPA With United

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-03-2017, 07:04 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 692
Default

Originally Posted by BigWillyCapt
Here's all you need to know. Total mandatory retirements at DAL, UAL, AA, SWA and FedEx in the next 10 yrs = 20,988. Total regional pilots right now for the top 13 = 18,581. Unless you are a knucklehead, don't meet the requirements for some reason, or are going to retire in that timeframe you should be able to get a job at a major airline.
They are sourcing applicants from many other places in addition to regionals. All of the LCCs, cargo, fractional, charter, larger 135 operators, everyone that wants to come home from Dubai, corporate/private jet operators and of course the military. Yes lots of regional people will go to legacies, but it won't be anywhere close to everyone. Also the government could pull an age 67 or 70 to shore things up a while longer.
sflpilot is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 10:28 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: P-28
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Not sure what "normal" numbers are for the ex-military annually, but I predict that number is going to go up dramastically over the next 5 years. People are turning down promotions and bonuses and getting out at a much higher rate than before.


People are getting out, and the military is having trouble retaining folks, but there are not as many pilots as there have been in the past. That is partly why you see some regionals looking to the military helicopter pilot as a potential source for new pilots. The Navy has just about as many,if not more, helo pilots as they do fixed wing pilots. Most just need about 150 fixed wing PIC hours and the multi engine time to qualify for an ATP as they already have enough total time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Tester130 is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 11:35 AM
  #143  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,123
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Not sure what "normal" numbers are for the ex-military annually, but I predict that number is going to go up dramastically over the next 5 years. People are turning down promotions and bonuses and getting out at a much higher rate than before.
Actually the contrary. The military doesn't have a bottomless well full of pilots, they're actually dealing with a very serious shortage right now.

It may spike for a few years, but within 5-10 years they will only be able to contribute MAYBE 1000 pilots per year, likely less.

The helo-conversion guys might supplement that a bit, but we aren't sure how significant that will be just yet.
threeighteen is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 12:50 PM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

Not 150 FW PIC, but 250. Unless you're referring to Navy only, and they get about 100 FW in flight training? The Army helo drivers get out with zero FW hours unless they flew on their own.

It's about time the airlines started realizing that helo pilots make better 121 pilots. Took them long enough!

Originally Posted by Tester130
People are getting out, and the military is having trouble retaining folks, but there are not as many pilots as there have been in the past. That is partly why you see some regionals looking to the military helicopter pilot as a potential source for new pilots. The Navy has just about as many,if not more, helo pilots as they do fixed wing pilots. Most just need about 150 fixed wing PIC hours and the multi engine time to qualify for an ATP as they already have enough total time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
HighFlight is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 12:53 PM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

I never said anything about a bottomless well of pilots. What I DID say is that more and more pilots are leaving the military in spite of the bonuses being thrown at them. Some are even turning down promotions, and some are foregoing sticking around for retirement. So for a while there will be an uptick in military pilots coming to the airlines.

I think the shortage to which you are referring is more off the top than off the bottom.

As for helo guys coming over, they are. Expect to see considerably more in the next 2-3 years as they get their FW ratings.

Originally Posted by threeighteen
Actually the contrary. The military doesn't have a bottomless well full of pilots, they're actually dealing with a very serious shortage right now.

It may spike for a few years, but within 5-10 years they will only be able to contribute MAYBE 1000 pilots per year, likely less.

The helo-conversion guys might supplement that a bit, but we aren't sure how significant that will be just yet.
HighFlight is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 01:17 PM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: P-28
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight
Not 150 FW PIC, but 250. Unless you're referring to Navy only, and they get about 100 FW in flight training? The Army helo drivers get out with zero FW hours unless they flew on their own.



It's about time the airlines started realizing that helo pilots make better 121 pilots. Took them long enough!


Correct, the Army helo drivers would need the full 250 PIC as well as all their fixed wing quals. I was referring to the Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, and Air Force rotor pilots who started in fixed wing and more than likely have at least a SEL commercial and airplane instrument. They would all be about 150 PIC hours short and represent a huge pool of pilots that could be trained quickly to qualify for an ATP.

There is an uptick in military pilots getting out to head to the airlines for now. Adding the helo pilots will help feed the regionals as they would not be competitive for a major until they have more fixed wing time.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Tester130 is offline  
Old 03-04-2017, 03:31 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

More and more mill pilots are flying UAVs, so have no experience inside an aircraft...
atpcliff is offline  
Old 03-04-2017, 03:58 AM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 812
Default

Originally Posted by Systemized
In my opinion, United is one step behind American.

Don't forget, American signed a deal for roughly 40 CRJ-700s with Skywest last year. Those plane were former United Express.

United is getting roughly 50 former American CRJ-200s through Air Wisconsin. It's a trade of regional pilots and American is getting more efficient planes while United takes a step back.

The 50 seaters have the most uncertain future among RJs and American is smart by keeping most of their 50 seat frames at their own companies.

American is adding new E175s at Envoy and used 700s at Skywest while old 200s leave the American system.

United screwed up by not paying Skywest more cheese to keep flying all the Expressjet E145s and Skywest 700s and they're paying for it now. Their product is taking a hit by shifting E145s from Expressjet to TSA and Comutair.

The future of American regional flying consists of more RJs operated by wholly owns which is smart considering the shortage of qualified and willing applicants and the better incentives wholly owns can offer.

The best thing United can do for it's RJ feed is start buying up regional airlines and offering the best flow through programs and overall pay. Their interview program and deal with Wisconsin is a step in the right direction but not enough.
UAL scope is maxed out on 70/76 seaters. The 50 seaters are a stop gap measure that is allowed under the scope clause. All those parked 70 seaters were to make way for 76 seat 175's. Ual deferred the 737-7 order until the max or neo bus is available to replace a good portion of the regional lift.

It doesn't make sense to buy and merge a regional list when there will never be a shortage of applicants at mainline and they can weed out the tin foil hat people. Most regionals have been hiring anyone with a pulse for the past 5 years. The flight attendants have language preventing it and the drama from the last integration is fresh on everyones mind.
Aquaticus is offline  
Old 03-04-2017, 07:42 AM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheFly's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Default

Someone in the first couple pages was asking for an email/link: United Airlines signs five-year CPA with Air Wisconsin | Airports & Routes content from ATWOnline
TheFly is offline  
Old 03-04-2017, 10:12 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff
More and more mill pilots are flying UAVs, so have no experience inside an aircraft...


You're out of your element, Donny.
soitgoes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 04:16 PM
Boeing Aviator
United
9
11-25-2016 01:58 PM
Einstein2014
Air Wisconsin
28
10-25-2015 07:18 PM
hoodabundy
United
217
08-18-2013 09:52 PM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 07:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices